Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Protocol of a master cohort study to evaluate the implementation of integrated proactive supportive care pathways in oncology.
Maria Alice Franzoi;
Arnaud Pages;
Loula Papageordious;
Antonio Di Meglio;
Ariane Laparra;
Elise Martin;
Aude Barbier;
Nathalie Renvoise;
Johanna Arvis;
Florian Scotte;
Ines Vaz-Luis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Supportive care (SC) refers to the prevention and management of complications of cancer and its treatment. While it has long been recognized as an important cancer care delivery component, a high proportion of patients face unaddressed SC needs calling for innovative approaches to deliver SC.
Objective:
This is a master protocol for a prospective cohort study evaluating the implementation of integrated proactive SC pathways across the cancer care continuum in our institution.
Methods:
This study is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of SC pathways in patient’s distress and unmet needs after 12-weeks, measured by the NCCN’s Distress Thermometer and problem list. Secondary objectives will focus on the pathway (macro-level) and each SC intervention (micro-level) evaluating: i) its reach (administrative data review); ii) short and long-term efficacy through its impact on quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, EORTC-QLQ-C30) and symptom burden (MDASI, HADS, ISI, EORTC-SHQ-C22); iii) adoption by patients and providers (administrative data review); iv) barriers and leverages for implementation (surveys and focus groups); v) maintenance (cost-consequence analysis). For the primary endpoint, patients participating in a SC pathway can enroll. For secondary endpoints, patients participating in SC interventions can enroll. Pilot evaluations with a minimum of 70 patients per pathway will be performed to generate mean Distress Thermometer scores and standard deviations informing the calculation of formal sample size needed for efficacy evaluation (cohorts will be enriched accordingly).
Results:
The protocol was approved by ethics committee and recruitment will start in December 2023.
Conclusions:
This study will inform the implementation of SC pathways of care.
Citation
Please cite as:
Franzoi MA, Pages A, Papageordious L, Di Meglio A, Laparra A, Martin E, Barbier A, Renvoise N, Arvis J, Scotte F, Vaz-Luis I
Evaluating the Implementation of Integrated Proactive Supportive Care Pathways in Oncology: Master Protocol for a Cohort Study