Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Sep 12, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 12, 2023 - Nov 7, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 15, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Importance of Patient History in Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Medical Diagnosis: Comparison Study

Fukuzawa F, Yanagita Y, Yokokawa D, Uchida S, Yamashita S, Li Y, Shikino K, Tsukamoto T, Noda K, Uehara T, Ikusaka M

Importance of Patient History in Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Medical Diagnosis: Comparison Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52674

DOI: 10.2196/52674

PMID: 38602313

PMCID: 11024399

Importance of Patient History in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Medical Diagnosis: A Comparison Study

  • Fumitoshi Fukuzawa; 
  • Yasutaka Yanagita; 
  • Daiki Yokokawa; 
  • Shun Uchida; 
  • Shiho Yamashita; 
  • Yu Li; 
  • Kiyoshi Shikino; 
  • Tomoko Tsukamoto; 
  • Kazutaka Noda; 
  • Takanori Uehara; 
  • Masatomi Ikusaka

ABSTRACT

Background:

Medical history contributes approximately 80% to the diagnosis, although physical examinations and laboratory investigations increase a physician’s confidence in the medical diagnosis. The concept of artificial intelligence (AI] was first proposed more than 70 years ago. Recently, its role in various fields of medicine has grown remarkably. However, no studies have evaluated the importance of patient history in AI-assisted medical diagnosis.

Objective:

This study explored the contribution of patient history to AI-assisted medical diagnoses.

Methods:

Using 30 cases from clinical vignettes from the British Medical Journal, we evaluated the accuracy of diagnoses generated by the AI model ChatGPT. We compared the diagnoses made by ChatGPT based solely on the medical history with the correct diagnoses. We also compared the diagnoses made by ChatGPT after incorporating additional physical examination findings and laboratory data alongside the history with correct diagnoses.

Results:

ChatGPT accurately diagnosed 76.6% of the cases with the medical history alone, consistent with previous research targeting physicians. We also found that this rate was 93.3% when additional information was included.

Conclusions:

Although adding additional information improves diagnostic accuracy, patient history remains a significant factor in AI-assisted medical diagnosis. Thus, when utilizing AI in medical diagnosis, it is crucial to include pertinent and correct patient histories for an accurate diagnosis. Our findings emphasize the continued significance of patient history in clinical diagnoses in this age and highlight the need for its integration into AI-assisted medical diagnosis systems.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fukuzawa F, Yanagita Y, Yokokawa D, Uchida S, Yamashita S, Li Y, Shikino K, Tsukamoto T, Noda K, Uehara T, Ikusaka M

Importance of Patient History in Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Medical Diagnosis: Comparison Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52674

DOI: 10.2196/52674

PMID: 38602313

PMCID: 11024399

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.