Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 11, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 11, 2023 - Sep 26, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 9, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effect of Prosocial Behaviors on e-Consultations in a Web-Based Health Care Community: Panel Data Analysis

Liu X, Guo H, Wang L, Hu M, Wei Y, Liu F, Wang X

Effect of Prosocial Behaviors on e-Consultations in a Web-Based Health Care Community: Panel Data Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52646

DOI: 10.2196/52646

PMID: 38663006

PMCID: 11082735

Prosocial Behaviors and Their Impact on E-Consultations: The Moderating Role of Online and Offline Doctor Reputation in an Online Healthcare Community

  • Xiaoxiao Liu; 
  • Huijing Guo; 
  • Le Wang; 
  • Mingye Hu; 
  • Yichan Wei; 
  • Fei Liu; 
  • Xifu Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patients using online healthcare communities (OHCs) for e-consultation services have the option to choose their service providers from an extensive online market. To stand out in this crowded field, doctors in OHCs often engage in prosocial behaviors, such as proactive and reactive actions, to attract more users. However, the effect of these behaviors on the volume of e-consultations remains unclear and warrants further exploration.

Objective:

This study investigates the impact of various prosocial behaviors on doctors’ e-consultation volume in OHCs and the moderating effects of doctors’ online and offline reputation.

Methods:

A panel dataset containing information on 2,880 doctors over a 22-month period was obtained from one of the largest OHCs in China. Data analysis was conducted using a two-way fixed effects model with robust clustered standard errors. A series of robustness checks were also performed, including alternative measurements of independent variables and estimation methods.

Results:

Results indicated that both types of doctors’ prosocial behaviors, namely proactive and reactive actions, positively impact their e-consultation volume. In terms of the moderating effects of external reputation, doctors’ offline professional titles were found to negatively moderate the relationship between their proactive behaviors and their e-consultation volume. However, these titles did not significantly affect the relationship between doctors’ reactive behaviors and their e-consultation volume. Additionally, doctors’ online recommendations from patients negatively moderated both the relationship between doctors’ proactive behaviors and e-consultation volume and the relationship between doctors’ reactive behaviors and e-consultation volume.

Conclusions:

Drawing upon Functional Motives Theory and Social Exchange Theory, this study categorizes doctors’ prosocial behaviors into proactive and reactive actions. It provides empirical evidence that prosocial behaviors can lead to an increase in e-consultation volume. This study also illuminates the moderating roles doctors’ online and offline reputations play in the relationships between prosocial behaviors and e-consultation volume.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liu X, Guo H, Wang L, Hu M, Wei Y, Liu F, Wang X

Effect of Prosocial Behaviors on e-Consultations in a Web-Based Health Care Community: Panel Data Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52646

DOI: 10.2196/52646

PMID: 38663006

PMCID: 11082735

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.