Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Sep 10, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 2, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Objective Comparison of the First-Person–View Live Streaming Method Versus Face-to-Face Teaching Method in Improving Wound Suturing Skills for Skin Closure in Surgical Clerkship Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

Halim F, Candrawinata VS, Widysanto A, Budihardja AS, Wahjoepramono POP, Irawan A, Sudirman T, Christina N, Koerniawan HS, Tobing JFL, Sungono V, Marlina M, Wahjoepramono EJ

Objective Comparison of the First-Person–View Live Streaming Method Versus Face-to-Face Teaching Method in Improving Wound Suturing Skills for Skin Closure in Surgical Clerkship Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52631

DOI: 10.2196/52631

PMID: 39291977

PMCID: 11423551

Objective comparison of first-person-view live streaming method vs. Face-to-face Teaching Method in improving Wound Suturing Skills For Skin Closure in Surgical Clerkship students: A Randomized Control Trial

  • Freda Halim; 
  • Valeska Siulinda Candrawinata; 
  • Allen Widysanto; 
  • Andi Setiawan Budihardja; 
  • Petra Octavian Perdana Wahjoepramono; 
  • Andry Irawan; 
  • Taufik Sudirman; 
  • Natalia Christina; 
  • Heru Sutanto Koerniawan; 
  • Jephtah Furano Lumban Tobing; 
  • Veli Sungono; 
  • Mona Marlina; 
  • Eka Julianta Wahjoepramono

ABSTRACT

Background:

Surgical training using digital online teaching media for medical student especially for surgical training is indispensable, yet it is still not widely explored objectively.

Objective:

To objectively assess teaching method effectiveness using Go-Pro media vs face-to-face teaching in training simple wounds suture to surgical clerkship students.

Methods:

Seventy-four clinical clerkship students at the Surgery Department of Pelita Harapan University between January-April 2023 were recruited as samples in this study, and randomly assigned into two groups: trained simple wound suturing skills by using Live-streaming (LS), or trained using Face-to-face (FTF) method. All of the samples were assessed objectively before and 1 week after training, using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The data will be obtained from the OSCE examination form and questionnaires.

Results:

In the paired-analysis of numerical differences of each participants pre-test and post-test we found LS still could enhance participants’ ability to do the procedural skills (FTF vs LS : 27.52±20.63 vs 24.41±16.68, p-value 0.4787) but the FTF still showed superior result in their mean post-test score compared with LS group (FTF vs LS : 86.44±10.97 vs 78.92±15.54 , p-value 0.0188).

Conclusions:

LS method could enhance students’ ability in mastering simple procedural skill such as simple wound suturing, but it is still not as good as FTF method.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Halim F, Candrawinata VS, Widysanto A, Budihardja AS, Wahjoepramono POP, Irawan A, Sudirman T, Christina N, Koerniawan HS, Tobing JFL, Sungono V, Marlina M, Wahjoepramono EJ

Objective Comparison of the First-Person–View Live Streaming Method Versus Face-to-Face Teaching Method in Improving Wound Suturing Skills for Skin Closure in Surgical Clerkship Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52631

DOI: 10.2196/52631

PMID: 39291977

PMCID: 11423551

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.