Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 9, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 9, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Transformation of Rheumatology Care in Germany: Cross-Sectional National Survey

May S, Darkow R, Knitza J, Boy K, Klemm P, Heinze M, Vuillerme N, Petit P, Steffens-Korbanka P, Kubbe S, Kladny H, Hornig J, Aries P, Welcker M, Muehlensiepen F

Digital Transformation of Rheumatology Care in Germany: Cross-Sectional National Survey

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e52601

DOI: 10.2196/52601

PMID: 39761546

PMCID: 11747535

Digital Transformation of German Rheumatology Care: Results of a Survey among Patients in Outpatient Rheumatology Clinics

  • Susann May; 
  • Robert Darkow; 
  • Johannes Knitza; 
  • Katharina Boy; 
  • Philip Klemm; 
  • Martin Heinze; 
  • Nicolas Vuillerme; 
  • Pascal Petit; 
  • Patricia Steffens-Korbanka; 
  • Susanne Kubbe; 
  • Heike Kladny; 
  • Johannes Hornig; 
  • Peer Aries; 
  • Martin Welcker; 
  • Felix Muehlensiepen

ABSTRACT

Background:

In recent years, healthcare has undergone a rapid and unprecedented digital transformation. In many fields of specialty care, such as rheumatology, this shift is driven by the growing number of patients and limited resources, leading to increased use of digital health technologies (DHT) to maintain high-quality clinical care. Prior studies examined user acceptance towards individual DHT in rheumatology, such as telemedicine, video consultations and mHealth. However, it’s essential to conduct cross-technology and continuous analyses of user acceptance and DHT utilization to maximize the benefits for all relevant stakeholders.

Objective:

To explore the current acceptance, usage and preferences on DHT among patients in rheumatology care in Germany.

Methods:

Rheumatology patients from three clinics in Germany were surveyed to understand their perspectives on DHT. The survey included main themes, including acceptance, preferences, COVID-19's impact, potentials, and barriers related to DHT. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.

Results:

More than half (53%) of 337 patients reported that they use DHT. Overall, 21% used wearables, 21% used mhealth apps, 9% used digital therapeutics (DiGA), 9% used electronic prescription, 4% used video consultations and 1% used at-home blood self-sampling. Nearly two thirds of the participants (65%) rated DHT as useful. While 69% reported a generally positive attitude toward DHT, about 40% mentioned their attitudes became more positive due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Main potentials of DHT reported by the participants were location-independent (72%) and time-independent use (64%). Main barriers included insufficient knowledge among users (49%) and limited information about DHT (40%).

Conclusions:

Patient acceptance and usage towards DHT in rheumatology is increasing in Germany. A prospective, standardized monitoring of digital transformation in rheumatology care is highly needed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

May S, Darkow R, Knitza J, Boy K, Klemm P, Heinze M, Vuillerme N, Petit P, Steffens-Korbanka P, Kubbe S, Kladny H, Hornig J, Aries P, Welcker M, Muehlensiepen F

Digital Transformation of Rheumatology Care in Germany: Cross-Sectional National Survey

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e52601

DOI: 10.2196/52601

PMID: 39761546

PMCID: 11747535

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.