Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Sep 6, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 1, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Can Large Language Models Replace Therapists? Evaluating Performance at Simple Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Tasks

Hodson N, Williamson S

Can Large Language Models Replace Therapists? Evaluating Performance at Simple Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Tasks

JMIR AI 2024;3:e52500

DOI: 10.2196/52500

PMID: 39078696

PMCID: 11322688

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Can LLMs replace therapists? Evaluating performance at simple CBT tasks

  • Nathan Hodson; 
  • Simon Williamson

ABSTRACT

We evaluated whether chatGPT-4 and Bard could perform simple tasks required of CBT therapists – explaining, identifying and reframing thoughts affected by cognitive distortions – finding variation in their performance across different tasks.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hodson N, Williamson S

Can Large Language Models Replace Therapists? Evaluating Performance at Simple Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Tasks

JMIR AI 2024;3:e52500

DOI: 10.2196/52500

PMID: 39078696

PMCID: 11322688

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.