Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Aug 30, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 20, 2024
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 20, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Private provider non-participation in disease surveillance: The role of trust
ABSTRACT
Background:
Recognition of the importance of valid, real-time knowledge of infectious disease risk has renewed scrutiny of private providers’ intentions, motives and obstacles to comply with infectious disease surveillance. Appreciation of how private providers’ attitudes shape their TB notification behaviors yields lessons for surveillance of emerging pathogens, antibiotic stewardship, and other crucial public health functions. Reciprocal trust among institutions is an under-studied part of the “software” of surveillance.
Objective:
We aimed to assess self-reported knowledge, motivation, barriers, and case notification behavior to public health authorities in Lagos, Nigeria. We sought to compare self-report against actual notifications received and cases found in facility records.
Methods:
A geographically representative, stratified sample of 278 private health care workers (HCWs) was surveyed using an adapted version of the citizen trust scale and self-reported surveillance behavior was contrasted with actual facility case counts.
Results:
Noncompliance with legal obligations to notify infectious diseases was not due to a lack of knowledge. Mean trust in public health scores were higher in those who notified cases via the Infectious Disease Surveillance Registry (IDSR) than those who did not [44.8, SE= 0.74 vs. 41.6, SE = 0.50,t(250)=3.76, p< .001, r=.231]. In a multivariable model, trust in public health authorities was the only predictor of comfort with disease notification. While self-reported notification behavior was predicted by age, gender, and positive interaction with public health bodies, self-report did not tally with actual notifications. Survey methods overestimated surveillance behavior.
Conclusions:
Providers perceive both risks and benefits to recording and reporting. In order to improve private providers’ public health behaviors, policymakers need to transcend instrumental and transactional approaches to surveillance to include building trust in public health, simplifying the task, and enhancing the link to improved health. A renewed attention to the ‘software’ of health systems (e.g. norms, values, and relationships) is vital to address pandemic threats.
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.