Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Aug 23, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 22, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Trial Participants’ Perceptions of the Impact of Ecological Momentary Assessment on Smoking Behaviors: Qualitative Analysis

Stevens ER, Li R, Xiang G, Wisniewski R, Rojas S, O'Connor K, Wilker O, Vojjala M, El-Shahawy O, Sherman SE

Trial Participants’ Perceptions of the Impact of Ecological Momentary Assessment on Smoking Behaviors: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e52122

DOI: 10.2196/52122

PMID: 38270520

PMCID: 10837109

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Perceptions of ecological momentary assessment impact on trial participants’ smoking behavior: A qualitative analysis of a pilot study

  • Elizabeth R Stevens; 
  • Rina Li; 
  • Grace Xiang; 
  • Rachel Wisniewski; 
  • Sidney Rojas; 
  • Katherine O'Connor; 
  • Olivia Wilker; 
  • Mahathi Vojjala; 
  • Omar El-Shahawy; 
  • Scott E Sherman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is an increasingly used tool for data collection in behavioral research. There has been limited evaluation of EMA’s potential influence on behavior.

Objective:

This paper examines perceptions of the potential behavioral influence of EMA on research participants enrolled in a tobacco treatment intervention.

Methods:

We performed a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with participants enrolled in a tobacco treatment intervention pilot randomized clinical trial that used text messaging to collect EMA data on smoking behaviors. Participants were prompted to share their experiences with the EMA texting component of the trial, but were not directly asked about the influence of the EMA on their behavior. Transcripts were coded according to the principles of the Framework analysis for applied research. The codes were then examined, summarized, and grouped together into themes using the principles of grounded theory.

Results:

Themes developed from the analysis suggest there is a potential for EMA, in the form of a text-messaging smoking diary, to influence participant smoking behaviors. EMA prompts’ impact was not uniform across participants with some perceiving it as a source of accountability, while others reported the messages serve as trigger for cigarette use.

Conclusions:

The collection of EMA smoking behavior data via text messaging may influence behaviors and perceptions of participants in tobacco treatment interventions. More research is needed to determine the magnitude of impact and mechanisms to account for the potential effects of EMA. A broader discussion of unintended effects introduced by the use of EMA is warranted among the research community. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Stevens ER, Li R, Xiang G, Wisniewski R, Rojas S, O'Connor K, Wilker O, Vojjala M, El-Shahawy O, Sherman SE

Trial Participants’ Perceptions of the Impact of Ecological Momentary Assessment on Smoking Behaviors: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e52122

DOI: 10.2196/52122

PMID: 38270520

PMCID: 10837109

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.