Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Perceptions of ecological momentary assessment impact on trial participants’ smoking behavior: Qualitative Analysis
Elizabeth R Stevens;
Rina Li;
Grace Xiang;
Rachel Wisniewski;
Sidney Rojas;
Katherine O'Connor;
Olivia Wilker;
Mahathi Vojjala;
Omar El-Shahawy;
Scott E Sherman
ABSTRACT
Background:
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is an increasingly used tool for data collection in behavioral research. There has been limited evaluation of EMA’s potential influence on behavior.
Objective:
This paper examines perceptions of the potential behavioral influence of EMA on research participants enrolled in a tobacco treatment intervention.
Methods:
We performed a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with participants enrolled in a tobacco treatment intervention pilot randomized clinical trial that used text messaging to collect EMA data on smoking behaviors. Participants were prompted to share their experiences with the EMA texting component of the trial, but were not directly asked about the influence of the EMA on their behavior. Transcripts were coded according to the principles of the Framework analysis for applied research. The codes were then examined, summarized, and grouped together into themes using the principles of grounded theory.
Results:
Themes developed from the analysis suggest there is a potential for EMA, in the form of a text-messaging smoking diary, to influence participant smoking behaviors. EMA prompts’ impact was not uniform across participants with some perceiving it as a source of accountability, while others reported the messages serve as trigger for cigarette use.
Conclusions:
The collection of EMA smoking behavior data via text messaging may influence behaviors and perceptions of participants in tobacco treatment interventions. More research is needed to determine the magnitude of impact and mechanisms to account for the potential effects of EMA. A broader discussion of unintended effects introduced by the use of EMA is warranted among the research community. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Please cite as:
Stevens ER, Li R, Xiang G, Wisniewski R, Rojas S, O'Connor K, Wilker O, Vojjala M, El-Shahawy O, Sherman SE
Trial Participants’ Perceptions of the Impact of Ecological Momentary Assessment on Smoking Behaviors: Qualitative Analysis