Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Aug 15, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 15, 2023 - Oct 10, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 30, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Challenges of Accrual and Retention During COVID-19 in a Randomized Controlled Trial Testing A Dyad-focused eHealth Intervention Running title: Challenges of Accrual and Retention
ABSTRACT
Background:
Family-based randomized controlled trials (RCT) face challenges in recruitment and retention. Most cancer-focused RCTs recruit convenience samples from local cancer centers and hospitals.
Objective:
In this study, we examined the recruitment and retention of a population-based patient-partner dyad cohort for an RCT, testing the efficacy of a dyadic eHealth intervention to improve the quality of life in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and their partners.
Methods:
In this two-arm, parallel groups RCT, men who recently completed treatment for localized PCa from across the state were recruited from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry Rapid Case Ascertainment (RCA) between April 2018 to April 2021. Notably, recruitment coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. After baseline assessments, we randomly assigned patient-partner dyads to the intervention or control group. Dyads completed follow-up surveys 4-, 8-, and 12 months post-baseline. Data were analyzed using descriptive analyses.
Results:
Of the 3,078 patients referred from RCA, 2,899 were contacted for screening; 357 partners were approached after obtaining interested and eligible patients’ permission; 280 dyads completed baseline assessments and randomized (dyad enrollment rate: 85.11%); and 221 dyads completed the 12-month follow-up (retention rate: 78.93%).
Conclusions:
Despite the negative impact of the pandemic, we successfully recruited enough patient-partner dyads to test our RCT hypotheses. Our recruitment and retention rates were equivalent to or higher than those in most dyadic intervention studies. A well-functioning research team and specific strategies (e.g., eHealth intervention, Internet phone, and online surveys) facilitated recruitment and retention in this dyadic RCT with PCa patients and their partners during the unprecedented pandemic. Clinical Trial: CT.gov NCT03489057
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.