Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 1, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 9, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Professionals Evaluating Clients’ Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments

Kaihlanen AM, Virtanen L, Kainiemi E, Heponiemi T

Professionals Evaluating Clients’ Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51450

DOI: 10.2196/51450

PMID: 38032707

PMCID: 10722370

Professionals evaluating clients’ suitability for digital health and social care –A scoping review of assessment instruments

  • Anu-Marja Kaihlanen; 
  • Lotta Virtanen; 
  • Emma Kainiemi; 
  • Tarja Heponiemi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Increased digital health and social care services are generally considered to improve people's access to services. However, not everyone can utilize these resources equally. Health and social care professionals should assess clients’ suitability for digital solutions, but to succeed, they need information about what to evaluate and how.

Objective:

This scoping review aimed to identify evaluation tools that professionals can use when assessing clients’ suitability for digital health and social care. We summarized the dimensions and the practical usefulness of the instruments.

Methods:

The MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science, and ASSIA databases were searched in February 2023 following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Details of the eligible studies were extracted, and qualitative content analysis according to the research objectives was performed.

Results:

A total of 19 articles introducing 12 different assessment instruments intended for the healthcare context were included in the review. No instruments were found for evaluating the suitability for digital social care. The instruments contained 60 dimensions of the client’s suitability for digital health, which reflected four perspectives: (1) skill-based suitability, (2) suitability based on general ability to maintain health, (3) suitability based on attitude and experience and (4) suitability based on practical matters. The described practical usefulness of the instruments included professionals’ possibility to (1) identify clients most in need of education and support, (2) direct and recommend right clients for right digital services, (3) ensure that clients can use digital health, (4) improve effectiveness and maximize the provision of digital health, (5) develop and redesign services and (6) empower clients.

Conclusions:

Based on the diverse assessment instruments available and the dimensions they measure, there seems to be no comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing clients’ prerequisites to utilize digital solutions. It is important to further develop comprehensive screening tools applicable to professionals’ busy work (both in health and social care) with defined threshold values for suitability.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kaihlanen AM, Virtanen L, Kainiemi E, Heponiemi T

Professionals Evaluating Clients’ Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51450

DOI: 10.2196/51450

PMID: 38032707

PMCID: 10722370

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.