Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 28, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 15, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Comparison of Conventional Root Canal Sealers With Ones That Use Green Synthesized Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Activity: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Mohamed A, Ismail E, Adam RZ

A Comparison of Conventional Root Canal Sealers With Ones That Use Green Synthesized Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Activity: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e51351

DOI: 10.2196/51351

PMID: 39393053

PMCID: 11512129

A comparison of conventional root canal sealers with ones that use green synthesized nanoparticles for antimicrobial activity: A systematic review protocol.

  • Abubaker Mohamed; 
  • Enas Ismail; 
  • Razia Z Adam

ABSTRACT

Background:

Root canal failure and secondary endodontic infection are frequent clinical scenarios in dentistry. The main microorganisms implicated in root canal therapy failure are persistent Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus. To combat the impact of disease resistance, scientists are concentrating on alternative antimicrobial root canal sealers. Nanomaterials are a recent development in endodontic materials that exhibit great antimicrobial properties, making them an ideal material choice for root canal sealers.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to compare the antimicrobial properties of conventional root canal sealers to those incorporating green synthesized nanoparticles.

Methods:

A well-constructed protocol was established and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021286373 ), Ethics approval was obtained from the Biomedical Research and Ethics Committee from the University of the Western Cape (UWC) (BM22/1/4). The used methods include all systematic review aspects, involving: a specified selection criterion, a well-planned search strategy, defined eligibility criteria to formulate the selection methods, and data collection followed by data extraction. After data extraction; quality assessment tools will be used to critically appraise the included studies. The use of statistical analysis measures for data analysis and presentation of the results.

Results:

Following the use of pre-set inclusion criteria and searching across the databases, the final laboratory studies will be identified, and the data extracted. If possible, a meta-analysis will be constructed, or a narrative presentation of the findings will be finalized.

Conclusions:

Using robust techniques, such as specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and using the suitable search string across various databases, leads to the inclusion of relevant laboratory and clinical studies. Finding out the quality of the acquired data will be made easier by using the proper critical appraisal tool. The presentation of the extracted data together with the creation of a meta-analysis or a narrative representation of the findings will reflect accordingly.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mohamed A, Ismail E, Adam RZ

A Comparison of Conventional Root Canal Sealers With Ones That Use Green Synthesized Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Activity: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e51351

DOI: 10.2196/51351

PMID: 39393053

PMCID: 11512129

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.