Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Jul 26, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 25, 2023 - Sep 19, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Patient Engagement and Perspectives with a Mobile Health Home Spirometry Intervention: Mixed Methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Patient engagement attrition in mobile health (mHealth) remote patient monitoring programs (RPM) erodes program benefits. Systemic disparities lead to inequities in RPM adoption and usage. There is an urgent need to understand the RPM patient experience in real-world studies, especially for patients who have dropped-off in engagement, as addressing issues faced by these patients may increase the value of mHealth for patients and subsequently decrease attrition.
Objective:
This study sought to understand patient engagement and experiences in a lung transplant RPM mHealth intervention.
Methods:
Lung transplant patients (N=601) were analyzed from an mHealth intervention for complication detection from 5/4/2020 to 11/1/2022. Predictors of patient engagement were evaluated using multivariable logistic and linear regression. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who had dropped-off. Themes were identified until saturation.
Results:
Patients with a transplant date one year or more before enrollment had 84% lower odds of engaging (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.35, p<0.01), 82% lower odds of submitting pulmonary function measurements (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.33, p<0.01), and 78% lower odds of completing symptom checklists (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.43, p<0.01). Patients with a non-English primary language had 78% lower odds of engaging compared to English speakers (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.67; p<0.01). Interviews revealed eight themes: Challenges with devices; Communication break-downs; Desire for “real” interactions; Better feedback around data reporting; Knowing that their data is being monitored; Understanding purpose of the chat; Understanding how their data is used; Recommendation for newer patients.
Conclusions:
Care delivery and patient experiences with RPM in lung transplant mHealth can be improved and made more equitable by tailoring outreach and enhancements towards patients with longer time between transplant and enrollment and non-English primary languages. Attention to designing programs to provide personalization, education, and information transparency may decrease attrition rates.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.