Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 22, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Impact of Intervention Design on User Engagement in Digital Therapeutic Research: A Factorial Experiment with a Mixed Method Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
User engagement is crucial for Digital Therapeutics (DTx) effectiveness; due to variations in the conceptualization of engagement and intervention design, assessment and retention of engagement remains challenging.
Objective:
The study investigated the influence of the perceived acceptability of experimental intervention components and satisfaction with core intervention components in DTx on user engagement, while also identifying potential barriers and facilitators to user engagement.
Methods:
This was a mixed-method study with a 2x2 factorial design, involving 12 Atopic Dermatitis outpatients. Participants were randomized into four experimental groups based on push notification (basic/advanced) and human coach (on/off) experimental intervention components. All participants engaged in self-monitoring and learning courses as core intervention components within an app-based intervention over eight weeks. Data were collected through in-app behavioral data, physicians/self-reported questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews assessed at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to evaluate user engagement, perceived acceptability of experimental intervention components (i.e., push notification and human coach), satisfaction with core intervention components (i.e., self-monitoring and learning course), and intervention effectiveness through clinical outcomes.
Results:
The primary outcome indicated that Group 4, provided with Advanced level push notifications and a Human coach, showed higher completion rates for self-monitoring forms and learning courses compared to the predetermined threshold of clinical significance. Qualitative data analysis revealed three key themes: (1) perceived acceptability of the experimental intervention components, (2) satisfaction with the core intervention components, and (3) suggestions for improvement in the overall intervention program. Regarding clinical outcomes, the Perceived Stress Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores presented the highest improvement in Group 4.
Conclusions:
These findings will help refine the intervention and inform the design of a subsequent randomized trial to test its effectiveness. Furthermore, this design may serve as a model for broadly examining and optimizing overall engagement in DTx and for future investigation into the complex relationship between engagement and clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0007675; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22592&search_page=L
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.