Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 29, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Snapshot of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse Related to Ethnic Minority Communities in the United Kingdom Between January and April 2022: Mixed Methods Analysis

Ullah N, Martin S, Poduval S

A Snapshot of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse Related to Ethnic Minority Communities in the United Kingdom Between January and April 2022: Mixed Methods Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e51152

DOI: 10.2196/51152

PMID: 38530334

PMCID: 10968668

A snapshot of Covid-19 vaccine discourse related to ethnic minority communities in the UK between January to April 2022: a mixed methods analysis.

  • Nazifa Ullah; 
  • Sam Martin; 
  • Shoba Poduval

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rising use of social media as an interactive health information ecosystem has led to the sharing of vaccine information and misinformation in an unprecedented manner. However, there is little research exploring the role of social media in the public discourse around the Covid-19 vaccine particularly amongst ethnic minority communities, who have the highest rates of vaccine hesitancy (delay or refusal of vaccination despite availability of services).

Objective:

This study aims to provide a broad overview of the discourse around Covid-19 vaccination on social media amongst and related to ethnic minority communities in the UK. We characterised social media posts by identifying underlying themes and highlighting patterns of conversations.

Methods:

Social media data from the UK was extracted from Twitter and YouTube using software Netlytics and YouTube Data Tools (YTDT) to provide a ‘snapshot’ of the discourse between January to April 2022. Sentiment and stance analysis were applied to better understand the overall tone of social media posts and opinions portrayed. Discourse and topic analysis were also applied to provide insight into the most frequent and weighted keywords and themes of conversations on social media platforms.

Results:

A total of 260 tweets and 156 comments from 4 YouTube videos were included in our analysis. In general YouTube tended to depict a higher percentage of negative sentiment and stance comments than Twitter. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that the main areas of discussion were related to concerns about vaccine programme implementation, in particular the focus on ethnic minorities in vaccination campaigns, questions over vaccination development and side effects, and wider systemic issues such as racism.

Conclusions:

Our study suggests a shift in narrative from concerns about the Covid-19 vaccine itself, towards the strategies utilised in vaccination implementation, in particular the targeting of ethnic minority groups through vaccination campaigns. The shortfalls in the communication strategies adopted to relay public health information to minority groups during the pandemic must be acknowledged if any meaningful improvement is to be made moving forward to strengthen both future vaccination campaigns and other public health interventions targeted towards these groups.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ullah N, Martin S, Poduval S

A Snapshot of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse Related to Ethnic Minority Communities in the United Kingdom Between January and April 2022: Mixed Methods Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e51152

DOI: 10.2196/51152

PMID: 38530334

PMCID: 10968668

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.