Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jan 17, 2024)

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2023

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Online Migration of Services Catalyzed by the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Based Pain Clinic: A Mixed Method Study of the Perspective from Providers, Patients and Staff

  • Brenda Lau; 
  • Emmanuel Abreu; 
  • Neha Singh; 
  • Tameus Venkataraman; 
  • Aidan McParland; 
  • Kai Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients living with chronic pain (CP) have experienced more frequent pain flare-ups with reduced access to routine pain management services. Many healthcare centers pivoted their operations to an online approach.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the transition from in-person to online services in a community-based pain clinic for patients with CP from the perspective of providers, patients, and implementers.

Methods:

The study followed a cross-sectional, concurrent mixed methods approach. The study primarily used quantitative methods, while qualitative data was used to contextualize patient and provider experiences. The study period was January 1st, 2019, to December 31st, 2021. Data regarding change in appointment volumes was derived from the Electronic Medical Record and analyzed using SPSS. There were two respondent groups – First, providers who consisted of doctors, allied health professionals, facilitators, management and support staff. The second group consisted of patients. These patients were randomly selected from among those who had a minimum of one encounter of care in 2021. Email questionnaires were sent to both groups. 44 providers and 1721 patients answered the questionnaire.

Results:

84,853 Encounters of Care (EOC) were analyzed. Some services experienced a 300% increase; others, formally on-site, experienced a decline of -70%. 86% of providers felt comfortable delivering care virtually and aim to continue even when it is not mandatory. Subjects using virtual care lived within an average 64.3 km distance from the facility. 75% of patients were satisfied with the delivery of virtual care for their chronic pain. Patients and facilitators both expressed that virtual mode reduces barriers and hence improves access.

Conclusions:

Migration from in-person to online services created many challenges for the team ranging from technological limitations, patient comfort with online platforms, and increased demands on the staff for patient support and billing. Telemedicine demonstrated to be a powerful tool to increase care access for patients with CP. More research is required to understand the efficacy of the interventions using standardized metrics.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lau B, Abreu E, Singh N, Venkataraman T, McParland A, Zhang K

Online Migration of Services Catalyzed by the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Based Pain Clinic: A Mixed Method Study of the Perspective from Providers, Patients and Staff

JMIR Preprints. 21/07/2023:51130

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.51130

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51130

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.