Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Physiological response to COVID-19 vaccine: Evidence for sex differences?
Andjela Markovic;
Vladimir Kovacevic;
Timo B. Brakenhoff;
Duco Veen;
Paul Klaver;
Marianna Mitratza;
George S. Downward;
Diederick E. Grobbee;
Maureen Cronin;
Brianna M. Goodale
ABSTRACT
Background:
Rapid development and implementation of vaccines constituted a crucial step in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive understanding of physiological responses to these vaccines is important to build trust in medicine.
Objective:
We investigated temporal dynamics before and after COVID-19 vaccination in four physiological parameters as well as the duration of menstrual cycle phases.
Methods:
In a prospective trial, 17’825 adults in the Netherlands wore a CE-certified and FDA-cleared medical device on their wrist for up to 9 months. The device recorded their physiological signals and synchronized with a complementary smartphone app. By means of multi-level quadratic regression, we examined changes in wearable-recorded breathing rate, wrist skin temperature, heart rate, heart rate variability, and objectively assessed duration of menstrual cycle phases in menstruating participants to assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccination.
Results:
The recorded physiological signals demonstrated short-term increases in breathing rate and heart rate after COVID-19 vaccination followed by a prompt rebound to baseline levels likely reflecting biological mechanisms accompanying the immune response to vaccination. No sex differences were evident in the measured physiological responses. In menstruating participants, we found a 0.8% decrease in the duration of the menstrual phase following vaccination.
Conclusions:
The observed short-term changes suggest that COVID-19 vaccines are not associated with long-term biophysical issues. Taken together, our work provides valuable insights into continuous fluctuations of physiological responses to vaccination and highlights the importance of digital solutions in health care.
Citation
Please cite as:
Markovic A, Kovacevic V, Brakenhoff TB, Veen D, Klaver P, Mitratza M, Downward GS, Grobbee DE, Cronin M, Goodale BM
Physiological Response to the COVID-19 Vaccine: Insights From a Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Trial