Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 30, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Physiological Response to the COVID-19 Vaccine: Insights From a Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Trial

Markovic A, Kovacevic V, Brakenhoff TB, Veen D, Klaver P, Mitratza M, Downward GS, Grobbee DE, Cronin M, Goodale BM

Physiological Response to the COVID-19 Vaccine: Insights From a Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e51120

DOI: 10.2196/51120

PMID: 39083770

PMCID: 11325110

Physiological response to COVID-19 vaccine: Evidence for sex differences?

  • Andjela Markovic; 
  • Vladimir Kovacevic; 
  • Timo B. Brakenhoff; 
  • Duco Veen; 
  • Paul Klaver; 
  • Marianna Mitratza; 
  • George S. Downward; 
  • Diederick E. Grobbee; 
  • Maureen Cronin; 
  • Brianna M. Goodale

ABSTRACT

Background:

Rapid development and implementation of vaccines constituted a crucial step in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive understanding of physiological responses to these vaccines is important to build trust in medicine.

Objective:

We investigated temporal dynamics before and after COVID-19 vaccination in four physiological parameters as well as the duration of menstrual cycle phases.

Methods:

In a prospective trial, 17’825 adults in the Netherlands wore a CE-certified and FDA-cleared medical device on their wrist for up to 9 months. The device recorded their physiological signals and synchronized with a complementary smartphone app. By means of multi-level quadratic regression, we examined changes in wearable-recorded breathing rate, wrist skin temperature, heart rate, heart rate variability, and objectively assessed duration of menstrual cycle phases in menstruating participants to assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccination.

Results:

The recorded physiological signals demonstrated short-term increases in breathing rate and heart rate after COVID-19 vaccination followed by a prompt rebound to baseline levels likely reflecting biological mechanisms accompanying the immune response to vaccination. No sex differences were evident in the measured physiological responses. In menstruating participants, we found a 0.8% decrease in the duration of the menstrual phase following vaccination.

Conclusions:

The observed short-term changes suggest that COVID-19 vaccines are not associated with long-term biophysical issues. Taken together, our work provides valuable insights into continuous fluctuations of physiological responses to vaccination and highlights the importance of digital solutions in health care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Markovic A, Kovacevic V, Brakenhoff TB, Veen D, Klaver P, Mitratza M, Downward GS, Grobbee DE, Cronin M, Goodale BM

Physiological Response to the COVID-19 Vaccine: Insights From a Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e51120

DOI: 10.2196/51120

PMID: 39083770

PMCID: 11325110

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.