Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 12, 2023 - Sep 6, 2023
Date Accepted: May 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Physician and Practice Characteristics Influencing Telemedicine Uptake Among Frontline Clinicians in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response: National Survey Study

Hamline MY, Xing G, Kravitz RL, Miller M, Melnikow J

Physician and Practice Characteristics Influencing Telemedicine Uptake Among Frontline Clinicians in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response: National Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50751

DOI: 10.2196/50751

PMID: 39018095

PMCID: 11292149

Physician and practice characteristics influencing telemedicine uptake among frontline clinicians in the early COVID-19 pandemic response: a national survey study

  • Michelle Y Hamline; 
  • Guibo Xing; 
  • Richard L Kravitz; 
  • Marykate Miller; 
  • Joy Melnikow

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telemedicine expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, as key policy changes, financial support, and pandemic fears tipped the balance toward virtual care. Despite this increased support and benefits to patients and clinicians, telemedicine uptake was variable across clinicians and practices. Little is known regarding physician and institutional characteristics underlying this variability.

Objective:

To evaluate factors influencing telemedicine uptake among frontline physicians in the early pandemic response.

Methods:

We surveyed a national stratified sample of frontline clinicians drawn from the AMA Masterfile in June/July 2020. The survey inquired about first month and most recent month (June 2020) of pandemic telemedicine use; sample data included clinician gender, specialty, census region, and years in practice. Local pandemic conditions were estimated from county-level data on COVID rates at the time of survey response. Data were analyzed in a weighted logistic regression, controlling for county-specific pandemic data, and weighted to account for survey data stratification and nonresponse.

Results:

Over the first 3-4 months of the pandemic, the proportion of physicians reporting use of telemedicine in >30% of visits increased from 30.4% to 36.2%. Relative to primary care, odds of substantial telemedicine use (>30%) both during the first month of the pandemic and in June 2020 were increased among infectious disease and critical care physicians and decreased among hospitalists and emergency medicine physicians. At least minimal pre-pandemic telemedicine use (OR 11.41, 95% CI 1.34-97.04) and a high two-week moving average of local COVID-19 cases (OR 10.16, 95% CI 2.07-49.97) were also associated with substantial telemedicine use in June 2020. There were no significant differences according to clinician gender, census region, or years in practice.

Conclusions:

Pre-pandemic telemedicine use, high local COVID-19 case counts, and clinician specialty were associated with higher levels of substantial telemedicine use during the early pandemic response.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hamline MY, Xing G, Kravitz RL, Miller M, Melnikow J

Physician and Practice Characteristics Influencing Telemedicine Uptake Among Frontline Clinicians in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response: National Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50751

DOI: 10.2196/50751

PMID: 39018095

PMCID: 11292149

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.