Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 12, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

Smayda KE, Cooper S, Leyden K, Ulaszek J, Ferko N, Dobrin A

Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e50438

DOI: 10.2196/50438

PMID: 37983080

PMCID: 10696501

InTandem™, a neurorehabilitation system to improve walking in the chronic stroke population: A validation study assessing safety and effectiveness of use

  • Kirsten Elisabeth Smayda; 
  • Sarah Cooper; 
  • Katie Leyden; 
  • Jackie Ulaszek; 
  • Nicole Ferko; 
  • Annamaria Dobrin

ABSTRACT

Background:

Persistent walking impairment following a stroke is common. Although rehabilitative interventions exist, few exist for use at home in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. MR-001 (InTandem™) is a neurorehabilitation system intended to improve walking and community ambulation in adults with chronic stroke walking impairment.

Objective:

Using design best practices and human factors engineering principles, the research presented here was conducted to validate the safety and effectiveness of use of InTandem.

Methods:

Fifteen participants in the chronic phase of stroke recovery (≥ six months post-stroke) participated in this validation study. Participants were scored on eight simulated use tasks, four knowledge assessments, and seven comprehension assessments in a simulated home environment. The number and types of use errors, close calls, and operational difficulties were evaluated. Analyses of task performances, participant behaviors, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the root cause of use errors, difficulties, and mitigation strategies.

Results:

During this validation study, 93% of participants (14 of 15) were able to successfully complete the critical tasks associated with simulated use of the InTandem system. Following simulated use task assessments, participants' knowledge and comprehension of the IFU and key safety information was evaluated. Overall, participants were able to find and correctly interpret information in the materials in order to answer the knowledge assessment questions. During the comprehension assessment, participants understood warning statements associated with critical tasks presented in the IFU. In total, three use errors were recorded. No adverse events, including slips, trips or falls, occurred in this study.

Conclusions:

In this validation study, people in the chronic phase of stroke recovery were able to safely and effectively use InTandem in the intended setting. This validation study contributes to the overall understanding of residual use-related risks of InTandem, in consideration of the established benefits.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Smayda KE, Cooper S, Leyden K, Ulaszek J, Ferko N, Dobrin A

Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e50438

DOI: 10.2196/50438

PMID: 37983080

PMCID: 10696501

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.