Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Jun 28, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 11, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Efficacy and Safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumphii) 25% Cream Versus Hydrocortisone 1% Cream in the Management of Mosquito Bite Reactions: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Gatmaitan JG, Gatmaitan-Dumlao JKG, Dayrit J, Gabriel MT

Efficacy and Safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumphii) 25% Cream Versus Hydrocortisone 1% Cream in the Management of Mosquito Bite Reactions: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e50380

DOI: 10.2196/50380

PMID: 37938881

PMCID: 10666022

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The efficacy and safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumpphi) 25% cream vs hydrocortisone 1% cream in the management of mosquito bite reactions: randomized, double blind controlled trial

  • Julius Garcia Gatmaitan; 
  • Jolene Kristine Garcia Gatmaitan-Dumlao; 
  • Johannes Dayrit; 
  • Ma. Teresita Gabriel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Most insect bite reactions resolve spontaneously, but the inflammation and pruritus induced have shown to decrease quality of life. Previous studies have shown potential anti-inflammatory properties of Tinospora rumpphi.

Objective:

To assess the efficacy and safety of Tinospora rumpphi 25% cream versus hydrocortisone 1% cream in the management of local cutaneous reactions caused by mosquito bites.

Methods:

This was a randomized double-blind study. Participants were exposed to sterile non-infectious mosquito (Aedes aegyptii) for 5-10 minutes to elicit cutaneous lesions. Tinospora 25% cream or hydrocortisone 1% cream were applied twice daily throughout the 7-day study period.

Results:

Fifty-eight participants were randomized to receive Tinospora cream (n=29) or hydrocortisone cream (n=29). All participants completed follow-up. There was a significant decrease in lesion size in both groups from the first 15 minutes to day 7 (P=.0001). Comparing the lesion size in both groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in lesion size on the 1st hour (P=.0034) and after 24 hours (P =.0268). On day 1, 10.3% of participants in the hydrocortisone group and 6.9 % in the Tinospora group experienced complete resolution. On day 3, all participants experienced complete resolution. No adverse effects were documented.

Conclusions:

Tinospora 25% cream is effective, safe, and comparable to hydrocortisone 1% cream as an anti-inflammatory agent for mosquito bite reactions, based on decrease in lesion size, proportion of participants with complete resolution of wheals and improvement in pruritus intensity score using visual analog scale. Long-term safety studies are recommended. Clinical Trial: The study was approved by the Institutional Board Review (IRB Number: 2019-07) of the Research Institute of Tropical Medicine.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gatmaitan JG, Gatmaitan-Dumlao JKG, Dayrit J, Gabriel MT

Efficacy and Safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumphii) 25% Cream Versus Hydrocortisone 1% Cream in the Management of Mosquito Bite Reactions: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e50380

DOI: 10.2196/50380

PMID: 37938881

PMCID: 10666022

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.