Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Jul 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 22, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effect of Explicit Suicide Language in Engagement With a Suicide Prevention Search Page Help-Seeking Prompt: Nonrandomized Trial

Onie S, Armstrong S, Josifovski N, Berlinquette P, Livingstone N, Holland S, Finemore C, Gale N, Elder E, Laggis G, Heffernan C, Theobald A, Torok M, Shand F, Larsen M

The Effect of Explicit Suicide Language in Engagement With a Suicide Prevention Search Page Help-Seeking Prompt: Nonrandomized Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2024;11:e50283

DOI: 10.2196/50283

PMID: 38502162

PMCID: 10988366

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The effect of explicit suicide language in engagement with a suicide prevention search page help seeking prompt: a non-randomised trial

  • Sandersan Onie; 
  • Susanne Armstrong; 
  • Natasha Josifovski; 
  • Patrick Berlinquette; 
  • Nicola Livingstone; 
  • Sarah Holland; 
  • Coco Finemore; 
  • Nyree Gale; 
  • Emma Elder; 
  • George Laggis; 
  • Cassandra Heffernan; 
  • Adam Theobald; 
  • Michelle Torok; 
  • Fiona Shand; 
  • Mark Larsen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Given that signage, messaging, or advertisements are the gateway to many interventions in suicide prevention, it is important that we understand what type of messaging works best for whom.

Objective:

We investigated whether explicitly mentioning suicide increased engagement by using internet ads, by investigating engagement with campaigns with different categories of keywords searched, which may reflect different cognitive states.

Methods:

We ran a two-arm study Australia-wide, with or without advertisements featuring explicit suicide wording. We analysed whether there were differences in engagement for campaigns with explicit and non-explicit advertisements for low-risk (distressed but not explicitly suicidal), high-risk (explicitly suicidal) and help-seeking for suicide keywords.

Results:

Our analyses revealed that having explicit wording has opposite effects depending on the search terms used: explicit wording reduces the engagement rate for individuals searching for low-risk keywords but increases engagement for those using high-risk keywords.

Conclusions:

The findings suggest that individuals who are aware of their suicidality respond better to campaigns that explicitly use the word suicide. It was found that individuals who were searching for low-risk keywords also responded to the explicit advertisement, suggesting some individuals are searching for low-risk keywords that are experiencing suicidality. Implications and future directions are discussed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Onie S, Armstrong S, Josifovski N, Berlinquette P, Livingstone N, Holland S, Finemore C, Gale N, Elder E, Laggis G, Heffernan C, Theobald A, Torok M, Shand F, Larsen M

The Effect of Explicit Suicide Language in Engagement With a Suicide Prevention Search Page Help-Seeking Prompt: Nonrandomized Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2024;11:e50283

DOI: 10.2196/50283

PMID: 38502162

PMCID: 10988366

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.