Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jun 24, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 24, 2023 - Aug 19, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 20, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Wearable Technologies for Detecting Burnout and Wellbeing in Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping ReviewDetecting Burnout and Wellbeing in Healthcare Professionals using Wearable Technologies: A Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
The occupational burnout epidemic is a growing issue, and in the United States, up to 60 percent of medical students, residents, physicians, and registered nurses experience symptoms. Wearable technologies may provide an opportunity to predict the onset of burnout and other forms of distress using physiological markers.
Objective:
This study team conducted a scoping review to identify physiological biomarkers of burnout, and establish what gaps are currently present in the use of wearable technologies for burnout prediction among healthcare professionals (HCPs).
Methods:
A comprehensive search of several databases was performed on June 7, 2022. No date limits were set for the search. The databases were: Ovid: MEDLINE(R), Embase, Healthstar, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection via Clarivate Analytics, Scopus via Elsevier, EBSCOhost: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL with Full Text, and Business Source Premier. Studies observing anxiety, burnout, stress, and depression utilizing a wearable device worn by a HCP were included, with HCP defined as medical students, residents, physicians, and nurses. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies.
Results:
The initial search yielded 505 articles, from which 10 (1.95%) studies were included in this review. The majority (n=8) described observational cohort studies, with a low risk of bias. There is a lack of long-term studies with a large sample size and wearable data that may be combined with system-level information. Reporting standards were also insufficient, particularly in device adherence and sampling frequency used for physiological measurements.
Conclusions:
Future digital health studies exploring utility of wearable technologies for burnout prediction should address these limitations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.