Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 23, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 7, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: Quantitative Exploratory Study

Rush KL, Burton L, Seaton CL, Loewen P, O'Connor B, Moroz L, Corman K, Smith MA, Andrade JG

Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: Quantitative Exploratory Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e50232

DOI: 10.2196/50232

PMID: 37707881

PMCID: 10540016

Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: A Quantitative Exploratory Study

  • Kathy L Rush; 
  • Lindsay Burton; 
  • Cherisse L Seaton; 
  • Peter Loewen; 
  • Brian O'Connor; 
  • Lana Moroz; 
  • Kendra Corman; 
  • Mindy A Smith; 
  • Jason G Andrade

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telehealth can optimize access to specialty care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Virtual AF care, however, may not fit with AF patients' complex needs.

Objective:

To explore the relationship between attitudes toward healthcare technologies, self-efficacy and telehealth satisfaction as part of future planning of virtual AF clinic care.

Methods:

AF patients over age 18 years from an urban-based, highly specialized AF clinic who had an upcoming telehealth visit were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey asked about demographic characteristics; use of technology; self-efficacy and healthcare technology attitudes, using a validated 30-item tool; and telehealth satisfaction (TSQ), using a validated 14-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, correlational analyses, and linear regression modeling.

Results:

Participants (n=195, 34% response rate) were primarily older, male and Caucasian with post-secondary schooling or more, and had high self-reported overall and mental-health ratings. A variety of technologies were used in their daily lives and for healthcare, including desktop and laptop computers, smartphones, and tablets. Self-efficacy and TSQ scores were high overall, with males having higher general, computer and healthcare technology self-efficacy (HTSE) and technology attitude scores. After controlling for age and sex, only HTSE was significantly related to individuals' attitudes toward healthcare technology. Both general self-efficacy and attitude toward healthcare technology were positively related to telehealth satisfaction.

Conclusions:

Consistent with a previous study, only HTSE significantly influenced attitudes toward healthcare technology. This finding confirms that, in this regard, self-efficacy is not a general perception but is domain-specific. Considering participants' predominant use of the telephone for virtual care, it follows that general self-efficacy and attitude toward healthcare technology were significant contributors to telehealth satisfaction. Given our patient's frequent use of technology and high computer self-efficacy and HTSE scores, use of video for telehealth appointments could be supported.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rush KL, Burton L, Seaton CL, Loewen P, O'Connor B, Moroz L, Corman K, Smith MA, Andrade JG

Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: Quantitative Exploratory Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e50232

DOI: 10.2196/50232

PMID: 37707881

PMCID: 10540016

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.