Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Social Media Analysis of Pemphigus

Pathak GN, Chandy RJ, Naini V, Razi S, Feldman SR

A Social Media Analysis of Pemphigus

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e50011

DOI: 10.2196/50011

PMID: 37856177

PMCID: 10623221

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Social Media Analysis of Pemphigus

  • Gaurav Nitin Pathak; 
  • Rithi John Chandy; 
  • Vidisha Naini; 
  • Shazli Razi; 
  • Steven R. Feldman

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increased use of social media platforms has allowed for greater discussion and dissemination of medical information to the public. Pemphigus is a rare spectrum of autoimmune-mediated blistering diseases associated with diagnostic delays, indicating a greater need for awareness of symptoms.

Objective:

To assess the frequency and the way in which pemphigus is discussed on social media and to characterize the sources generating pemphigus-related content.

Methods:

To identify the social media footprint of pemphigus, the popular social media applications Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube were searched in April 2023. The common search phrase #pemphigus was queried on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. Information regarding support groups was ascertained on Facebook groups. Information regarding the sender, level of engagement, and type of content (educational, promotional, personal, or recruitment) was analyzed.

Results:

Most of the YouTube content analyzed (60%) was created by physicians and 100% of content was educational. Instagram had a high proportion of non-human pemphigus content (49%), and organizations were the most common publishers (76%). Physicians contributed 50% of Twitter pemphigus content with the highest engagement, while patients created very few tweets (6%), non-human pemphigus made up 12% of total Twitter content. The majority of Facebook support groups was for pemphigus vulgaris (80%) and most Facebook pemphigus posts were for general awareness.

Conclusions:

Current use of social media for pemphigus revolves around educational content and establishing support systems. There is a need for more human-centered pemphigus content by patients and trusted healthcare professionals, as well as support groups for other types of pemphigus besides pemphigus vulgaris.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pathak GN, Chandy RJ, Naini V, Razi S, Feldman SR

A Social Media Analysis of Pemphigus

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e50011

DOI: 10.2196/50011

PMID: 37856177

PMCID: 10623221

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.