Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Novel Evaluation Model for Assessing ChatGPT on Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Certification Examinations: Performance Study

Long C, Lowe K, Zhang J, Santos Ad, Alanazi A, Wright E, Cote D

A Novel Evaluation Model for Assessing ChatGPT on Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Certification Examinations: Performance Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e49970

DOI: 10.2196/49970

PMID: 38227351

PMCID: 10828939

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating ChatGPT-4 in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Certification Examination using the CVSA Model

  • Cai Long; 
  • Kayle Lowe; 
  • Jessica Zhang; 
  • André dos Santos; 
  • Alaa Alanazi; 
  • Erin Wright; 
  • David Cote

ABSTRACT

Background:

ChatGPT is among the most popular Large Language Models (LLM), exhibiting proficiency in various standardized tests, including multiple-choice medical board examinations. However, its performance on Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) certification exams and open-ended medical board certification examinations has not been reported. We present the first evaluation of LLM (ChatGPT-4) on such examinations and propose a novel method to assess an artificial intelligence (AI) model’s performance on open-ended medical board examination questions.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to evaluate an LLM (ChatGPT-4) on OHNS board exams and propose a novel method to assess an artificial intelligence (AI) model’s performance on open-ended medical board examination questions.

Methods:

Twenty-one open end questions were adopted from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada’s sample exam to query ChatGPT-4 on April 11th, 2023, with and without prompts. A new CVSA (concordance, validity, safety, and accuracy) model was developed to evaluate its performance.

Results:

In an open-ended question assessment, ChatGPT-4 achieved a passing mark (an average of 75% across three trials) in the attempts. The model demonstrated high concordance (92.06%) and satisfactory validity. While demonstrating considerable consistency in regenerating answers, it often provided only partially correct responses. Notably, concerning features such as hallucinations and self-conflicting answers were observed.

Conclusions:

ChatGPT-4 achieved a passing score in the sample exam, and demonstrated the potential to pass the Canadian Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Royal College board examination. Some concerns remain due to its hallucinations that could pose risks to patient safety. Further adjustments are necessary to yield safer and more accurate answers for clinical implementation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Long C, Lowe K, Zhang J, Santos Ad, Alanazi A, Wright E, Cote D

A Novel Evaluation Model for Assessing ChatGPT on Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Certification Examinations: Performance Study

JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e49970

DOI: 10.2196/49970

PMID: 38227351

PMCID: 10828939

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.