Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Jun 9, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 9, 2023 - Jun 23, 2023
Date Accepted: May 26, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Development of Interoperable Computable Phenotype Algorithms for Adverse Events of Special Interest to Be Used for Biologics Safety Surveillance: Validation Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Adverse events (AEs) associated with vaccination have been evaluated by epidemiological studies, and more recently gained additional attention with the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct post-market surveillance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to monitor several adverse events of special interest (AESIs) to ensure vaccine safety, including for COVID-19.
Objective:
This study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) Initiative, which aims to improve FDA’s post-market surveillance capabilities while minimizing public burden. This study looks to enhance active surveillance efforts through a rules-based, computable phenotype algorithm to identify five AESIs: anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), and febrile seizure. AESI phenotype algorithms can be developed to apply to electronic health record (EHR) data at health provider organizations across the country by querying for standard and interoperable codes. The codes queried in the rules represent symptoms, diagnoses, or treatments of the AESI sourced from published case definitions and input from clinicians.
Methods:
To validate the performance of the algorithms, we applied them to EHR data from a United States academic health system and clinicians evaluated a sample of cases. Performance was assessed using positive predictive value (PPV).
Results:
Our anaphylaxis algorithm was the best performing, having a PPV of 93.3%. The PPVs for our febrile seizure, myocarditis/pericarditis, TTS, and GBS algorithms were 89.0%, 83.5%, 70.2%, and 47.2%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Given our algorithm design and performance, our results support continued research into using interoperable algorithms for widespread AESI post-market detection.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.