Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Jun 14, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 8, 2023 - Aug 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 7, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Algorithmic Case Identification of Depression in Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: Systematic Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain large amounts of detailed clinical information. Using chart review to identify conditions within large quantities of EMRs can be time-consuming and inefficient. EMR-based phenotyping utilizing machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) algorithms is a continually developing area of study that holds potential for numerous mental health disorders.
Objective:
This review outlines and evaluates the current state of EMR-based case phenotyping for depression.
Methods:
A systematic review of EMR-based algorithms for phenotyping depression was completed. This research encompassed studies published from January 2000 to May 2023. The search involved three databases: Embase, MEDLINE, and APA PsycInfo. This was done using selected keywords that fall into three categories: terms connected with EMR, terms connected to case identification, and terms pertaining to depression. This document adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines.
Results:
A total of 20 articles were assessed and summarized in the review. Most of these studies were undertaken in the United States, accounting for 75% (15/20). This was followed by the United Kingdom with 15% (3/20) and Spain with 10% (2/20). Both data-driven and clinical rule-based methodologies were identified. The development of EMR-based phenotypes and algorithms is indicative of the data accessibility permitted by each respective health system, leading to varying performance levels among different algorithms.
Conclusions:
It is crucial to understand the commonalities and disparities in health systems, data gathering techniques, data release procedures, and current clinical routes for successful algorithm development strategies. There have been several propositions for strategies that aid in defining cases based on phenotype.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.