Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: May 24, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: May 24, 2023 - Jul 19, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 21, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
The Effect of Online Culinary Medicine to Enhance Protein Intake on Muscle Quality in Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Sarcopenia is the progressive and generalized loss of muscle mass, strength, and function. In the US, 15.51% of older adults have been diagnosed with sarcopenia. Culinary medicine (CM) is a novel evidence-based medical field that combines the science of medicine with food and cooking to prevent and treat potential chronic diseases. Thus, a CM program can be an innovative strategy to improve protein intake in independent older adults through at-home cooking and successfully reduce barriers to protein intake, enabling older adults to enhance their diet and muscle quality.
Objective:
Therefore, our study aimed to examine how an online CM intervention, emphasizing convenient ways to increase lean red meat intake, could improve protein intake with the promotion of physical activity to see how this intervention could affect older adults’ muscle strength and mass.
Methods:
A 16-week single-center, parallel-group, randomized study was conducted, comparing an online culinary medicine intervention group (CMG) teaching about enhancing protein intake to a control group (CNG) while monitoring each group’s muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical activity for muscle quality. The final participant total for the data analysis was 24 in the CMG and 23 in the CNG.
Results:
No between-group difference in muscle mass (p = 0.881) and strength (dominant: p = 0.920 and non-dominant: p = 0.715) change from the pre-study was detected. No statistically significant difference in protein intake was seen between the groups (p = 0.498). A borderline non-significant time-by-intervention interaction was observed for daily protein intake (p = 0.08). However, a statistically significant time effect was observed (p = <0.001). Post hoc testing showed that daily protein intake was significantly higher at weeks 2-16 vs. week 1 (p < 0.05) in the cohort. At week 16, intake was 16.9 g (95% CI, 5.77 to 27.97) higher than at pre-study.
Conclusions:
A CM program aimed to enhance protein intake and muscle quality did not affect protein intake and muscle quality. Insufficient consistent protein intake, low physical activity, intervention adherence, and questionnaires’ accuracy could explain the results. Future studies could include an interdisciplinary staff, different recruitment strategies, and different muscle mass measurements. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05593978
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.