Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 24, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 31, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Centering Public Perceptions on Translating AI Into Clinical Practice: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Consultation Focus Group Study

Lammons W, Silkens M, Hunter J, Shah S, Stavropoulou C

Centering Public Perceptions on Translating AI Into Clinical Practice: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Consultation Focus Group Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e49303

DOI: 10.2196/49303

PMID: 37751234

PMCID: 10565616

Patient and public involvement and engagement to center public perceptions on translating Artificial Intelligence into clinical practice: a PPIE consultation using focus groups

  • William Lammons; 
  • Milou Silkens; 
  • Jamie Hunter; 
  • Sudhir Shah; 
  • Charitini Stavropoulou

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely considered to be the new technical advancement capable of a large-scale modernization of healthcare. Considering AI’s potential impact on the clinician-patient relationship, healthcare provision, and healthcare systems more widely, patients and the wider public should be a part of the development, implementation, and embedding of AI-applications in healthcare. Failing to establish patient and public engagement and involvement (PPIE) can limit AI’s impact.

Objective:

(1) Understand patients’ and the public’s perceived benefits and challenges for AI. (2) Clarify how to best conduct PPIE in projects on translating AI into clinical practice given public perceptions of AI.

Methods:

This qualitative PPIE focus-group consultation was conducted in the United Kingdom (UK). Seventeen public collaborators representing seven National Institute of Health and Social Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborations (ARCs) across England participated in one of three online semi-structured focus group discussions. We explored public collaborators’ understandings, experiences, and perceptions of AI-applications in healthcare. Transcripts were co-analyzed iteratively with two public co-authors using thematic analysis.

Results:

We identified three primary deductive themes with seven corresponding inductive subthemes. Primary theme 1 -Advantages of implementing AI in healthcare– had two subthemes: System improvements and Benefit to patients and carers. Primary theme 2 -Challenges of implementing AI in healthcare– had three subthemes: Challenges with security, bias, and access, Public (mis)understanding of AI, and Lack of human touch in care and decision-making. Primary theme 3 -Recommendations on PPIE for AI in healthcare- had two subthemes: Experience, empowerment, and raising awareness, and acknowledging and supporting diversity in PPIE.

Conclusions:

Patients and the public can bring unique perspectives on the development, implementation, and embedding of AI for healthcare. Early PPIE is therefore crucial to safeguard patients, but also to increase the chances of acceptance of AI by the public and the impact AI can make in terms of outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lammons W, Silkens M, Hunter J, Shah S, Stavropoulou C

Centering Public Perceptions on Translating AI Into Clinical Practice: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Consultation Focus Group Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e49303

DOI: 10.2196/49303

PMID: 37751234

PMCID: 10565616

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.