Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine
Date Submitted: May 24, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: May 23, 2023 - Jul 18, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 22, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Predicting Patient Satisfaction Through Online Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: A Quantitative Study using the Meaning Extraction Method
ABSTRACT
Background:
Challenging encounters in healthcare professions are relatively common, also among dental health professionals. Challenging encounters can be defined as stressful situations with patients, or more specifically as dealing with anxious or angry patients. Traditionally, the patient's perspective on treatment situations has been researched through use of surveys, observations, or interview data. Online reviews make it possible for patients to rate and write about their experiences with healthcare providers and can be a useful source for investigating topics such as patient satisfaction and experiences of challenging encounters.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to identify the dominant themes from patient written online reviews of dentists, and to investigate how these themes could predict patient satisfaction with dental treatment.
Methods:
The study data consisted of 11,764 reviews written by dental patients, which included 1-5-star ratings on overall satisfaction and a free text comment. The free text comments were analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software (LIWC), and the Meaning Extraction Method (MEM) was used to group words into thematic categories. These themes were used as variables in a multilevel logistic regression analysis to predict patient satisfaction.
Results:
Eight themes emerged from the analyses, of which six; Explanation (OR=2.56, P<.001), Assurance (OR=3.61, P<.001), Professional Advice (OR=1.81, P<.001), Recommendation (OR=1.30, P<.001), Performance Assessment (OR=2.16, P<.001) and Facilities (OR=1.77, P=.023); increased the odds of experiencing high patient satisfaction. The remaining two themes, Consequences of Treatment Need and Patient Centered Care, reduced the odds (OR=0.24 and OR=0. 62 respectively, P<.001) of experiencing high patient satisfaction.
Conclusions:
MEM is an interesting approach to explore patients’ written accounts of encounters with dental health professionals. The experiences told by patients provide insight into key elements related to patient satisfaction that can be utilized in education of dental health professionals and to improve provision of dental health services.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.