Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 21, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 16, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Insurance coverage for telehealth services and analysis of appointment scheduling metrics for selected healthcare specialties: A case study in Arkansas
ABSTRACT
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered policy changes in 2020 that allowed insurance companies to reimburse telehealth services, which led to increased telehealth usage, especially in rural and medically underserved areas. However, with many emergency rules ending in 2022, patients and providers are concerned about a potential loss of access to these services. To inform reimbursement decisions, our analysis examines telehealth usage in Arkansas from 2020 to 2022, drawing on electronic medical records collected by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center (UAMSHealth).
Objective:
Evaluate the opportunities and challenges in using telehealth as the means of increasing access to healthcare in Arkansas.
Methods:
We employed statistical tools to compare the number of telehealth and in-person visits for specific specialties, including OB/GYN, Psychiatry, Family Medicine, Gerontology, Internal Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, and investigated insurance coverage trends for each. Our evaluation also included a procedure to calculate appointment performance metrics such as waiting time and appointment length.
Results:
Our analysis revealed a significant increase in telehealth visits across all specialties from 2020 to 2021. Meanwhile, the total number of in-person visits covered by Medicare and Medicaid decreased between 2020 and 2022 compared to 2019. Psychiatry, OB/GYN, and Family Medicine had the highest number of telehealth visits, with psychiatry telehealth visits showing shorter wait times than in-person appointments. These findings highlight the potential benefits of telehealth in providing access to healthcare, particularly for patients needing psychiatric care.
Conclusions:
Limiting healthcare access by returning to pre-pandemic regulations could negatively impact Arkansas, where a large population resides in medically underserved and rural areas. However, our analysis indicates that telehealth usage in Arkansas remained stable beyond 2020, with the number of psychiatry telehealth visits continuing to increase in 2021 and 2022. We hope our findings will influence insurance companies and policymakers to consider reimbursement policies not only in Arkansas but also in other regions facing similar healthcare access challenges.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.