Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIRx Bio

Date Submitted: May 16, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 22, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Loch Ness Monster: If It’s Real, Could It Be an Eel?

Foxon F

The Loch Ness Monster: If It’s Real, Could It Be an Eel?

JMIRx Bio 2023;1:e49063

DOI: 10.2196/49063

If it's real, could it be an eel?

  • Floe Foxon

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have estimated the size, mass, and population of hypothetical unknown animals in a large, oligotrophic freshwater loch in Scotland based on biomass and other observational considerations. The 'eel hypothesis' proposes that the anthrozoological phenomenon at Loch Ness can be explained in part by observations of large specimens of European eel (Anguilla anguilla), as these animals are most compatible with morphological, behavioural, and environmental considerations. The present study expands upon the 'eel hypothesis' and related literature by estimating the probability of observing eels at least as large as have been proposed, using catch data from Loch Ness and other freshwater bodies in Europe. Skew normal and generalized extreme value distributions were fitted to eel body length distributions in order to estimate cumulative distribution functions from which probabilities were obtained. The chances of finding a large eel in Loch Ness are around 1 in 50,000 for a 1-meter specimen, which is reasonable given the loch's fish stock and suggests some sightings of smaller 'unknown' animals may be accounted for by large eels. However, the probability of finding a specimen upwards of 6 meters is essentially zero, therefore eels probably do not account for 'sightings' of larger animals. The existence of exceedingly large eels in the loch is not likely based on purely statistical considerations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Foxon F

The Loch Ness Monster: If It’s Real, Could It Be an Eel?

JMIRx Bio 2023;1:e49063

DOI: 10.2196/49063

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.