Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: May 12, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 28, 2024
Co-creating an automated mHealth apps systematic review process with generative AI: Design Science Research
ABSTRACT
Background:
The use of mobile devices for delivering health-related services (mHealth) has rapidly increased, leading to a demand for summarizing the state of the art and practice through systematic reviews (SRs). However, the SR process is resource-intensive and time-consuming. Generative AI has emerged as a potential solution to automate tedious tasks, and the present study explores the possibility of using such tools to automate SRs and evaluates its scope and limitations.
Objective:
In the larger context of developing evidence-based mHealth solutions, the present study explores the possibility of using generative AI tools to automate time-consuming and resource-intensive tasks like SR; and evaluates its scope and limitations.
Methods:
The study utilizes Design Science Research (DSR) methodology. The solution proposed is to use co-creation with a generative AI, ChatGPT, to produce software code that automates the process for conducting systematic reviews.
Results:
A triggering prompt was generated and assistance from the generative AI was used to guide the steps towards developing, executing, and debugging a Python script. Errors in code were solved through conversational exchange with ChatGPT and a tentative script was created. The code pulled the mHealth solutions from the Google Play Store and searched their descriptions for keywords that hinted towards evidence base. The results were exported to a CSV file which was compared to the initial outputs of other similar SR processes.
Conclusions:
The present study demonstrates the potential of using generative AI to automate the time-consuming process of conducting systematic reviews of mHealth apps. This approach could be particularly useful for researchers with limited coding skills. However, the study has limitations related to the DSR methodology, subjectivity bias, and the quality of the search results used to train the language model.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.