Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 8, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 25, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Risk Identification in Perinatal Health Care Settings via Technology-Based Recruitment Methods: Comparative Study

Beatty JR, Zelenak L, Gillon S, McGoron L, Goyert G, Ondersma S

Risk Identification in Perinatal Health Care Settings via Technology-Based Recruitment Methods: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e48823

DOI: 10.2196/48823

PMID: 38437004

PMCID: 10949130

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Technology-Based Recruitment and Risk Identification in Perinatal Healthcare Settings

  • Jessica R Beatty; 
  • Logan Zelenak; 
  • Spencer Gillon; 
  • Lucy McGoron; 
  • Gregory Goyert; 
  • Steven Ondersma

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital screening and intervention tools have shown promise in the identification and reduction of substance use in health care settings. However, research in this area is impeded by under-reporting of substance use as well as by challenges integrating recruitment efforts into ongoing clinical workflows or staffing multiple study clinics with full-time research assistants.

Objective:

To evaluate pragmatic methods for facilitating disclosure and study recruitment in healthcare settings: first comparing disclosure in interaction with technology vs. a nurse intake interview; and second examining disclosure and recruitment rate using flyer- vs. research assistant-based methods.

Methods:

Study 1 compared alcohol use disclosure using standard practice alcohol screening during a nurse intake interview to self-screening on a tablet using the identical interview question. The second study compared disclosure of substance use and risk screener positivity under two different recruitment strategies, in person vs. via a flyer with a QR code/study website and examined recruitment rates for the two approaches.

Results:

In Study 1, among 48 patients completing a nurse-delivered pregnancy intake and answering the same question on a study tablet, disclosure was higher for the tablet-administered vs. nurse-administered screening (61.2% vs. 31.3% reporting any use). In Study 2, participants recruited via flyer were more likely to screen positive for alcohol use risk on the T-ACE than those recruited at the clinic (37.5% vs. 19.3%; χ2 [1, 121] = 4.86, p= .028).

Conclusions:

Participant recruitment via technology in perinatal health care appears to facilitate disclosure, particularly when participants can learn about the research and complete screening using their own device at a place and time convenient for them. Distribution of QR code flyers by medical staff appears to be an efficient and cost-effective method of recruitment that also facilitates disclosure while reducing impact on clinic workflows.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Beatty JR, Zelenak L, Gillon S, McGoron L, Goyert G, Ondersma S

Risk Identification in Perinatal Health Care Settings via Technology-Based Recruitment Methods: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e48823

DOI: 10.2196/48823

PMID: 38437004

PMCID: 10949130

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.