Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: May 9, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men’s Mental Health Using the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program: User Experience Study

Seidler ZE, Benakovic R, Wilson MJ, Fletcher J, Oliffe JL, Owen J, Rice SM

Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men’s Mental Health Using the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program: User Experience Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e48804

DOI: 10.2196/48804

PMID: 37934579

PMCID: 10664012

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men’s Mental Health: User-experience Feedback of the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program

  • Zac Eugene Seidler; 
  • Ruben Benakovic; 
  • Michael J Wilson; 
  • Justine Fletcher; 
  • John L Oliffe; 
  • Jesse Owen; 
  • Simon M Rice

ABSTRACT

Background:

Engaging men in psychotherapy is essential in male suicide prevention efforts, yet to date efforts to upskill mental health practitioners in delivering gender-sensitised therapy for men have been lacking. To address this, we developed Men in Mind, an e-learning training program designed to upskill mental health practitioners in engaging men in therapy.

Objective:

This study involves in-depth analysis of user experience of the Men in Mind intervention, assessed as part of a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of the intervention.

Methods:

Following completion of the intervention, participants provided qualitative (n=392) and quantitative (n=395) user-experience feedback, focused on successes and suggested improvements to the intervention, and improvements to their confidence in delivering therapy with specific sub-populations of male clients. We also assessed practitioner learning goals (n=242) and explored the extent to which participants had achieved these goals at follow-up.

Results:

Participants valued the inclusion of video demonstrations of skills in action, alongside the range of evidence-based content dedicated to improving their insight into engagement of men in therapy. Suggested improvements most commonly reflected the desire for more (or more diverse) content, alongside necessary adaptations to improve the learning and user experience. Participants also commonly reported improved confidence to assist men with difficulty articulating their emotions in therapy and suicidal men.

Conclusions:

This evidence aids in plans to scale Men in Mind and informs future development of practitioner training interventions in men’s mental health. Clinical Trial: All relevant documentation regarding the trial was pre-registered and available at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001669886).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Seidler ZE, Benakovic R, Wilson MJ, Fletcher J, Oliffe JL, Owen J, Rice SM

Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men’s Mental Health Using the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program: User Experience Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e48804

DOI: 10.2196/48804

PMID: 37934579

PMCID: 10664012

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.