Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: May 10, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 6, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 12, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Investigating Citizens’ Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy

Fox G, van der Werff L, Rosati P, Lynn T

Investigating Citizens’ Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e48700

DOI: 10.2196/48700

PMID: 38085914

PMCID: 10835590

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Investigating Citizens’ Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Examining the Role of Trust and Privacy

  • Grace Fox; 
  • Lisa van der Werff; 
  • Pierangelo Rosati; 
  • Theo Lynn

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for understanding citizen acceptance of health surveillance technologies such as contact tracing (CT) apps. Indeed, the success of these apps requires widespread public acceptance and the alleviation of concerns around privacy, surveillance, and trust.

Objective:

This study examines the factors which foster a sense of trust and a perception of privacy in CT apps. Our study also investigates how trust and perceived privacy influence citizens’ willingness to adopt, disclose personal data, and continue to use these apps.

Methods:

Drawing on privacy calculus and procedural fairness theories, we develop a model of the antecedents and behavioral intentions related to trust and privacy perceptions. We used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses on a dataset collected at two time points (prior to and post launch of a national CT app). The sample consisted of 405 Irish residents.

Results:

Trust in CT apps was positively influenced by propensity to trust technology (β .078, P = .006), perceived need for surveillance (β .112, P < .001), perceptions of government motives (β .679, P < .001), and negatively by perceived invasion (β -.224, P < .001). Perceived privacy was positively influenced by trust (β .465, P < .001), and perceived control (β .453, P < .001), and negatively by perceived invasion (β -.164, P < .001). Pre-launch intentions towards adoption and disclosure were influenced by trust (β .590, P < .001), and perceived privacy (β .248, P < .001), whereas post-launch intentions were directly influenced by pre-launch intentions (β .530, P < .001), and indirectly by trust and perceived privacy.

Conclusions:

Positive perceptions of trust and privacy can be fostered through clear communication regarding the need and motives for CT apps, the level of control citizens maintain, and measures to limit invasive data practices. By engendering these positive beliefs prior to launch and reinforcing them post-launch, citizens may be more likely to accept and use CT apps.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fox G, van der Werff L, Rosati P, Lynn T

Investigating Citizens’ Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e48700

DOI: 10.2196/48700

PMID: 38085914

PMCID: 10835590

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.