Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 26, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 24, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Platinum Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wang Q, Chang Z, Liu X, Wang Y, Feng C, Ping Y, Feng X

Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Platinum Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e48527

DOI: 10.2196/48527

PMID: 38252469

PMCID: 10845031

Predictive value of machine learning for platinum chemotherapy responses in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Qingyi Wang; 
  • Zhuo Chang; 
  • Xiaofang Liu; 
  • Yunrui Wang; 
  • Chuwen Feng; 
  • Yunlu Ping; 
  • Xiaoling Feng

ABSTRACT

Background:

The present study aimed to systematically review relevant literature on the predictive value of machine learning for platinum-based chemotherapy responses in ovarian cancer(OC) patients.

Objective:

This meta-analysis study aimed to systematically review relevant literature on the predictive value of machine learning for platinum response in ovarian cancer. Accurate prediction of platinum sensitivity is important to facilitate individualized treatment for ovarian cancer.The authors summarized previous studies that used machine learning methods, and concluded that machine learning can accurately predict the response of ovarian cancer. The review is extremely important and germane to the researchers and clinicians working in this field.

Methods:

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane for relevant studies on predictive models for platinum-based therapies for OC published before April 26, 2023. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment (PROBAST) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included articles. The C statistic, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of prediction models to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for platinum chemotherapy responses in OC patients.

Results:

A total of 1749 articles were examined, and 19 of them involving 38 models were eligible. The most commonly used modeling methods are LR (n=18; 47%), XGBoost (n=4; 10%), and SVM (n=4; 10%). The training cohort reported C statistics in 38 predictive models, with a pooled value of 0.800; the validation cohort reported C statistics in 11 (28%) predictive models, with a pooled value of 0.827. SVM performed well in both the training and validation cohorts, with a C statistic of 0.942 and 0.877, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 0.910, and the pooled specificity was 0.850.

Conclusions:

Machine learning can effectively predict how OC patients respond to platinum-based chemotherapy and may provide a reference for the development or updating of subsequent scoring systems.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang Q, Chang Z, Liu X, Wang Y, Feng C, Ping Y, Feng X

Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Platinum Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e48527

DOI: 10.2196/48527

PMID: 38252469

PMCID: 10845031

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.