Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Apr 26, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 26, 2023 - Jun 21, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 26, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Guide development for eHealth interventions targeting people with a low socioeconomic position: A co-design study.
ABSTRACT
Background:
People with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely to benefit from eHealth interventions, exacerbating social inequalities. Professionals in the field face many challenges regarding development, adaptation and application of eHealth for this group.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to describe the development of an inclusive eHealth guide based on the needs and wishes of professionals in developing and adapting eHealth interventions for individuals with a low SEP.
Methods:
The study took place between December 2020 and December 2022 and was conducted in two phases. The first phase involved the development of the content and information structure for the guide. It was informed by data from two studies performed earlier. A Delphi study about barriers and facilitators identified by professionals (top-down) and a community-based participatory study that identified attitudes of the target group (bottom-up). In the second phase, we developed the guide through an iterative participatory process with 11 professionals. We used test versions (prototypes) and think-aloud testing combined with semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire to identify design requirements and adapted the guide accordingly. Data were analyzed using thematic analyses.
Results:
We formulated 16 requirements on system, content and service aspects for the design of an online guide to support professionals during the development and adaptation of eHealth for people with a low SEP. For the system category, the guide was required to have an open navigation strategy leading to more specific information and short pages with visual elements. Content requirements included providing comprehensible information, scientific evidence, a user perspective, information on practical application, and a personal and informal tone-of-voice. Service requirements involved improving suitability for different professionals, ensuring long-term viability, and a focus on implementation. We developed a final version of ‘the inclusive eHealth guide’ according to these requirements.
Conclusions:
The online guide resulting from this study provides an important step to improve the development of eHealth for people with a low SEP. The guide, being aligned with the needs and wishes of professionals working in this field, addresses existing gaps and could serve as a solid starting point for those looking to develop or adapt eHealth interventions for low SEP populations. Future research should investigate how to make the guide more suitable to different goals of end-users, while also determining the external validity and applicability of the guide for eHealth interventions for people with a low SEP.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.