Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Apr 19, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 19, 2023 - Jun 14, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 27, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics Administration for Cellulitis Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yin R, Jiang J, Wang Y, Jin Y, Qian E, Yue C, Jiang C, Wang M, Xu K, Zhou X, Hou W

Comparing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics Administration for Cellulitis Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e48342

DOI: 10.2196/48342

PMID: 37921834

PMCID: 10656654

Comparing oral versus intravenous antibiotics administration for cellulitis infection: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Raymond Yin; 
  • Jingyi Jiang; 
  • Yiyang Wang; 
  • Yuhao Jin; 
  • Eric Qian; 
  • Chenyang Yue; 
  • Coco Jiang; 
  • Michelle Wang; 
  • Kylie Xu; 
  • Xiaoyuan Zhou; 
  • Winston Hou

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cellulitis is defined as infection of the skin that is usually characterized by localized but poorly demarcated areas of erythema, swelling and pain. Beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillin or different generations of cephalosporins are commonly used, but guidelines and physician preference vary widely as many different antibiotic options exists. This lack of standardization in evidence, guideline, and physician practice prompted this systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized trial data as well as cohort studies to aggregate the current available evidence for the optimal routes of antibiotic administration in cellulitis treatment.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of oral versus intravenous antibiotic administration for the treatment of cellulitis.

Methods:

We will search MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL via OVID as well as Web of Science and CINAHL for all available literature comparing different routes of antibiotic administration for the treatment of cellulitis. We will perform title and abstract as well as full text screening in duplicate according to the PRIMSA guidelines, and then extract the relevant data using a pre-piloted data sheet. We will include all antibiotic classes, including studies that compared antibiotics across different classes. The primary outcome for our review is duration to infection resolution, with secondary outcomes such as incidence of sepsis, mortality, hospital admission, C.diff infection, etc. We will assess the risk of bias in our included studies using the ROB2.0 and ROBINS-I tools, with final quality assessment using the GRADE framework.

Results:

We will publish the final results of our systematic review in a peer-reviewed academic journal.

Conclusions:

To our knowledge, this is the most up-to-date and inclusive review of the best available evidence comparing the different routes of antibiotic administration for cellulitis. Because of the vast selection of antibiotic options available and the empirical nature of the treatment without culture guidance, we anticipate heterogeneity within our synthesized data but nonetheless hope to provide the aggregated evidence on the efficacy of intravenous versus oral administration of antibiotics in cellulitis treatment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yin R, Jiang J, Wang Y, Jin Y, Qian E, Yue C, Jiang C, Wang M, Xu K, Zhou X, Hou W

Comparing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics Administration for Cellulitis Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e48342

DOI: 10.2196/48342

PMID: 37921834

PMCID: 10656654

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.