Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 17, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 1, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Radiology Residents’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Chen Y, Wu Z, Wang P, Xie L, Yan M, Jiang M, Yang Z, Zheng J, Zhang J, Zhu J

Radiology Residents’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48249

DOI: 10.2196/48249

PMID: 37856181

PMCID: 10623237

Ready to embrace artificial intelligence? Results of a nationwide survey on radiology residents in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Yanhua Chen; 
  • Ziye Wu; 
  • Peicheng Wang; 
  • Linbo Xie; 
  • Mengsha Yan; 
  • Maoqing Jiang; 
  • Zhenghan Yang; 
  • Jianjun Zheng; 
  • Jingfeng Zhang; 
  • Jiming Zhu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been transforming the world, and a key but controversial battleground of AI applications is health care, particularly in diagnostic specialties such as radiology. However, few studies systematically explore the response of ‘human intelligence’ to AI.

Objective:

The aims of this study are to understand their perceived replacement, usefulness and acceptance of AI, and identify antecedent factors. We consider the impact of a wide range of factors including demographic characteristics, working status, psychosocial aspects, personal experience, and contextual factors.

Methods:

A total of 3666 radiology residents from China completed a cross-sectional survey between 1 December 2020 and 30 April 2021. Multivariable logistic regression models are adopted also to examine various factors and associations. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were reported.  

Results:

Overall, radiology residents have a positive attitude towards AI, with 29.89% agreeing that AI would reduce the demand for radiologists, 72.80% believing AI improves disease diagnosis, and finally 78.18% believing radiologists should embrace AI. Many associated factors such as age, gender, education, eye strain status, working hours, time spent on medical images, resilience, burnout, the experience of hearing of AI, the experience of using AI, the perceived residency support, and the perceived residency stress have been found to have significant impacts on the attitudes towards AI. For instance, those with burnout symptoms are more concerned with being replaced by AI (OR = 1.86, P <.001), less favourable to AI usefulness (OR = 0.77, P=.005), and less expected to use AI (OR = 0.71, P<.001). In addition, adjusting for all other factors, two opposite AI perceptions, perceived AI replacement (OR = 0.81, P<.001) and AI usefulness (OR = 5.97, P<.001), have been proved to significantly influence the intention to use AI, respectively.

Conclusions:

This study characterises radiology residents who embrace AI. Our rich findings inform a multidimensional approach for physicians to adapting to AI. Targeted policies in terms of digital healthcare initiatives, medical education, etc., can be developed accordingly.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chen Y, Wu Z, Wang P, Xie L, Yan M, Jiang M, Yang Z, Zheng J, Zhang J, Zhu J

Radiology Residents’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48249

DOI: 10.2196/48249

PMID: 37856181

PMCID: 10623237

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.