Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Apr 20, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
High quality e-health websites for information on endometriosis: a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
E-health websites are being increasingly used to obtain information about endometriosis by the community and for self-learning and for recommendations to patients by clinicians. Critical evaluation is needed to inform users of their quality.
Objective:
To evaluate the quality of endometriosis e-health websites and provide high-quality recommendations to the community and clinicians.
Methods:
PRISMA 2020 guidelines informed two Google searches using incognito mode of international and Australian e-health websites. The first search string used terms ‘endometriosis’, ‘adenomyosis’ or ‘pelvic pain’ whereas ‘Australia’ was added to the second search string. Only free e-health websites in English were included. ENLIGHT, a validated tool, assessed the quality of each e-health website across 7 domains. A final average score of >3.7 was considered high-quality.
Results:
Fifty-nine e-health websites were screened and 49 included. Eleven high-quality websites were identified: Endometriosis Australia Facebook Page, Endometriosis UK, National Action Plan for Endometriosis on EndoActive, Endometriosis by Jean Hailes for Women’s Health, Adenomyosis by Jean Hailes for Women’s Health, Endometriosis by IVF Australia, Adenomyosis by Sydney Morning Herald, Endometriosis by National Health System, Endometriosis by Safe Work Australia, Adenomyosis by the Medical Republic, and Endometriosis by Royal Australian College for General Practitioners. These websites provided easily understood, accurate information. The last two e-health websites were resources for clinicians. Recommendations on search engine optimisation are provided to improve reach and discoverability of e-health websites.
Conclusions:
Although geographical location can influence the search results, we identified eleven high-quality endometriosis e-health websites that can be recommended to those with endometriosis and clinicians. To improve Google ranking, e-health websites should leverage search engine optimisation tools. Clinical Trial: A systematic review protocol was developed and registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; registration CRD42020185475) after which the systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.