Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 13, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 6, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Dong Q, Liu T, Liu R, Yang H, Liu C

Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48166

DOI: 10.2196/48166

PMID: 37379077

PMCID: 10365623

Effectiveness of digital health literacy interventions in older adults: a single arm meta-analysis

  • Qian Dong; 
  • Ting Liu; 
  • Ran Liu; 
  • Hongxia Yang; 
  • Cuiping Liu

ABSTRACT

Background:

In a world of rapid digital technology development, the lack of digital health literacy (DHL) among older people cannot be ignored. DHL is becoming an essential competency that can facilitate the health status and health management of older adults. DHL interventions that are feasible and appropriate can be implemented on a large scale through the healthcare system for older people.

Objective:

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of DHL interventions for older adults.

Methods:

English publications in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to November 20, 2022. Two reviewers independently completed the data extraction and quality assessment. Review Manager version 5.4 software was used for all meta-analyses.

Results:

A total of 7 studies conducted on 710 older adults were considered as eligible. e-HEALS scores at the baseline and post intervention were considered as the primary outcome. Knowledge, self-efficacy, and skills were the secondary outcomes. Of the 7 studies, 3 used face-to-face instruction, while 4 adopted online interventions. Among them, 4 of the interventions were conducted using theoretical guidance, while 3 were not. Intervention duration varied from 2 to 8 weeks. In addition, the studies included were all conducted in developed countries, mainly in the United States. Pooled analysis presented that DHL interventions had positive effects on eHealth literacy efficacy (standardized mean difference 0.94, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.61; P=.007). Subgroup analysis revealed that DHL interventions that chose face-to-face teaching (standardized mean difference 2.15, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.40; P<.001), were guided by a conceptual framework (standardized mean difference 1.55, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.67; P=.007), were sustained over 4 weeks (standardized mean difference 1.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.78; P=.01) and had a more significant effect. Moreover, the outcomes showed moderate gains in knowledge (standardized mean difference 0.76, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.20; P<.001) and self-efficacy (standardized mean difference 0.77, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.47; P=.03). No statistically significant effect was found for skills. The small number of studies, variable study quality and heterogeneity are some limitations of this review.

Conclusions:

Digital health literacy (DHL) interventions have positive effects on health status and health management of older adults. Practical and effective DHL interventions are crucial for the use of modern digital information technology in managing the health of older people. Clinical Trial: It registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023410204).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dong Q, Liu T, Liu R, Yang H, Liu C

Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48166

DOI: 10.2196/48166

PMID: 37379077

PMCID: 10365623

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.