Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Apr 7, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 7, 2023 - Apr 21, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
User Perceptions of Visual Clot in a High–Fidelity Simulation Study: a Mixed Qualitative–Quantitative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Viscoelastic hemostatic assays, such as ROTEM or TEG, enable prompt diagnosis and accelerate targeted treatment. However, the complex interpretation of the results remains challenging. Visual Clot - a situation awareness-based visualization technology - was developed to assist clinicians in interpreting viscoelastic tests.
Objective:
Following a previous high-fidelity simulation study, we analyzed users' perceptions of the technology to identify its strengths and limitations from clinicians' perspectives.
Methods:
This is a mixed qualitative-quantitative study consisting of interviews and an online survey. After solving coagulation scenarios using Visual Clot in high-fidelity simulations, we interviewed anesthesia personnel about the perceived advantages and disadvantages of the new tool. We used a template approach to identify dominant themes in interview responses. Out of these themes, we then defined five main statements, which were rated on Likert scales in the online questionnaire.
Results:
We interviewed 77 participants and 23 completed the online survey. We identified nine frequently mentioned topics by analyzing interview responses. The most common themes were ``positive design features``, ``intuitive and easy to learn`` and ``lack of a quantitative component ``. In the online survey, 70% of participants agreed that Visual Clot is easy to learn and that a combination of Visual Clot and ROTEM would help manage complex hemostatic situations.
Conclusions:
A group of anesthesia care providers found Visual Clot well-designed, intuitive and easy to learn. Participants highlighted its usefulness in emergencies, especially for clinicians inexperienced in coagulation management. However, the lack of quantitative information is an area for improvement.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.