Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Mar 31, 2023
Date Accepted: Oct 25, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Assessing the Readability and Quality of Patient Information on the Internet
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Internet has become a major source of information on health-related issues.
Objective:
The aim is to evaluate the quality and readability of online information present on nasopharyngeal cancer using recognised scoring tools
Methods:
Keywords including “nasopharyngeal cancer” and “nasopharyngeal carcinoma” were searched for using internet search engines: Google, Yahoo and Bing. Website authorship were classified: academic, commercial, or unspecified. Each website was assessed for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease score and the Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Quality of information was assessed using the JAMA and DISCERN tools and presence of a HONcode seal.
Results:
A total of thirty websites were included in our study. Over half of the websites were academic (60%; 18/30). The average JAMA and DISCERN scores of all websites were 2.57 0.95 and 50.38 11.82, respectively, with a median of 2.0 (range 1-4) and 53.50 (range 29-75), respectively. Commercial websites had the highest JAMA score with a mean of 3.50 0.52. Academic websites had the highest DISCERN score with a mean of 50.83 12.19. Five websites had the HON code seal. Commercial websites had a significantly higher JAMA mean score than academic (P-value < .001) and unspecified (P < .04) websites. Readability was difficult as none of the websites were at or below the recommended sixth-grade readability level.
Conclusions:
Internet information relating to nasopharyngeal cancer is of variable and suboptimal quality. Given this variability in quality, healthcare providers should direct patients to known sources of reliable, readable online information. Identification of reliable sources may be aided by known markers of quality such as HON-code certification. Clinical Trial: n
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.