Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 28, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 28, 2023 - May 23, 2023
Date Accepted: May 17, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study

Thielmann RRLC, Hoving C, Cals JW, Crutzen R

The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e47659

DOI: 10.2196/47659

PMID: 37266981

PMCID: 10276325

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effects of Patient Online Access to General Practice Medical Records: A Longitudinal Survey Study on Patients’ Perceptions

  • Rosa Ricarda Leni Charlotte Thielmann; 
  • Ciska Hoving; 
  • Jochen WL Cals; 
  • Rik Crutzen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient online access to medical records is assumed to facilitate patient empowerment and advance patient-centred healthcare. However, to date, the actual effect of online access on patient perceptions regarding these and other outcomes is insufficiently empirically tested.

Objective:

To investigate the effects that patients perceive from online access on patient empowerment, the patient-provider relationship, and informed decision-making.

Methods:

A nationwide two-wave longitudinal survey study among Dutch adults was conducted (N=2402). Linear regression analyses were conducted. In Model 1, perceived effect of online access (use measured at T1) on sixteen outcomes (measured at T2), associated with use of online access to general practice medical records in previous research, was investigated. Model 2 included socio-demographic factors and patient characteristics as confounders.

Results:

Users indicated more strongly than non-users that online access would increase their participation in healthcare, improve the relationship with their general practitioner, and support informed decision-making. These results were robust when adjusted for influence of confounders. Effect sizes were very small (B ranging between -0.39 and 0.28). Higher digital and health literacy were associated with higher ratings of almost all effects.

Conclusions:

Online access has the potential to empower patients and foster patient informed decision-making. Effects in this study were small but might grow over time. Possibly other factors such as attitude of general practitioners towards online access moderate these effects. Results indicate that potential benefits of online access might be(come) unevenly distributed. We advise future exploration of the conditions under which online access can improve healthcare system functioning and efficiency without increasing health inequality.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Thielmann RRLC, Hoving C, Cals JW, Crutzen R

The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e47659

DOI: 10.2196/47659

PMID: 37266981

PMCID: 10276325

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.