Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Mar 20, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 8, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in South Korea: Qualitative Study

Sim B, Ju JH, Kim B, Lee JY

Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in South Korea: Qualitative Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e47407

DOI: 10.2196/47407

PMID: 37933414

PMCID: 10644948

Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in Korea: A Qualitative Study

  • Boram Sim; 
  • Jin Han Ju; 
  • Byungsoo Kim; 
  • Jin Yong Lee

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital therapeutics (DTx) refers to software-driven therapeutic interventions enabling patients to manage their health in any given setting. The DTx market emergence has spurred discussions concerning reimbursement pathways because securing this guarantees a stable market for DTx developers upon release. However, its development is still at an early stage worldwide, with limited evidence. Thus, now it has become crucial for a social consensus to decide whether to reimburse DTx from the National Health Insurance (NHI) fund.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine multiple stakeholders’ awareness and attitudes toward DTx and perceptions of regulatory pathways for adopting DTx. This is the first study to comprehensively analyze perceptions of various stakeholder groups regarding DTx reimbursement in Korea.

Methods:

In-depth interviews were conducted with 11 DTx-related stakeholders in Korea using semi-structured guidelines, covering topics like awareness and attitudes toward DTx, if DTx is worth introducing in the market, if they agreed with DTx being reimbursed by the NHI fund, and how to adopt DTx.

Results:

While consumers were unaware of the concept of DTx, the remaining participants were familiar with it. However, all participants showed positive attitudes toward DTx. Most participants responded that DTx deserves to enter the market; however, they could not agree on the reimbursement pathways. Although participants supported DTx reimbursement from the NHI in principle, they responded that a conservative approach is required as sufficient clinical evidence has yet to be generated.

Conclusions:

The primary concern regarding the implementation of DTx was not the technology but the differences in opinion regarding the reimbursement method. We found that the NHI funds, operated conservatively, are insufficient for quickly adopting DTx. Various reimbursement methods should be rapidly employed to generate clinical evidence and reduce the uncertainty regarding DTx. Clinical Trial: None.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sim B, Ju JH, Kim B, Lee JY

Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Digital Therapeutics Reimbursement in South Korea: Qualitative Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e47407

DOI: 10.2196/47407

PMID: 37933414

PMCID: 10644948

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.