Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Mar 14, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review

Nassehi D, Gripsrud BH, Ramvi E

Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e47280

DOI: 10.2196/47280

PMID: 38748465

PMCID: 11137420

Theoretical perspectives underpinning research on physician–patient relationship in a digital health practice: A scoping review

  • Damoun Nassehi; 
  • Birgitta Haga Gripsrud; 
  • Ellen Ramvi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Physician-patient relationships are important for patients’ health outcomes. The rapid introduction of new technologies has brought complex dimensions into this relationship.

Objective:

The main objective of this scoping review is to explore empirical research on the use of digital health technologies and how these affect the physician-patient relationship.

Methods:

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for this scoping review, and 50 studies were included. The data were summarized through a narrative synthesis of the findings.

Results:

We found that physicians perceived digital health software as time-consuming and intrusive. Their lack of trust and concern with the technology resulted in increased inefficiency and workload and in reduced quality of health care delivery. Physicians accepted technology when it resulted in benefits. Patients felt that digital health technology shifted the power balance in their favor. This finding was biased toward young, literate, financially secure patients. The use of digital technology did not reduce the number of patient consultations. Instead, patients who felt more intimate with their physicians would communicate more with them online. This resulted in increased patient loyalty, which in some cases could resemble a customer relationship.

Conclusions:

The review highlights the understanding that, in the search for better and more effective health care services, patients are seen as consumers, and the focus is on technology that increases patient access to the physician. This process is without regard for the physician and negatively affects them. The physician-patient relationship is strengthened when technology is used to improve mutual understanding, sharing, and communication. If focus is placed on digital technology that can help improve the physician-patient relationship, we believe that better health outcomes and efficiency will be happy by-products. Based on this scoping review, we would like to see further research on technology that can strengthen the relational bond between the physician and patient. Clinical Trial: The review protocol is registered at the Center for Open Science’s Open Science Framework.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nassehi D, Gripsrud BH, Ramvi E

Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e47280

DOI: 10.2196/47280

PMID: 38748465

PMCID: 11137420

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.