Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 12, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 6, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Evaluation of Reliability and Quality of Short Videos in Liver Cancer: Cross-sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
China is a large country with hepatitis B. The incidence of liver cancer is increasing and people are becoming more and more concerned about liver cancer. Short video as a convenient source of acquiring health information is gaining more and more popularity, but the quality of short videos is not well evaluated.
Objective:
Our study aimed to assess the quality of information in videos associated with liver cancer on Chinese short video sharing platforms (TikTok and Bilibili ).
Methods:
In March 2023, we retrieved and screened the top 100 videos both on TikTok and Bilibili respectively and extracted the basic information of the videos. Later，we divided the videos into 2 groups according to different sources and different content, each with subgroups, and applied two rating tools, Global Quality Score (GQS) and DISCERN, to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. And then we further performed correlation analysis.
Results:
According to 166 videos, doctors uploaded most videos, accounting for 53.9%(89/166) and news and reports contributed the most(42.8%,71/166). Individuals tend to have longer videos compared with news agencies and doctors (p<.0001and p<.001, respectively). The median GQS and DISCERN scores of all 166 videos were 2.5(1,4) and 4(1,6), which indicated most videos had poor quality with only 28% (47/166) of the videos considered excellent and good, and also only 29% (48/166) of the videos considered reliable or relatively reliable. The total GQS scores of doctors were significantly higher than that of individuals(p<.001), disease knowledge higher than treatment and news and reports (p=0.04 and p<.0001, respectively) and prevention higher than news and reports(p<.001). DISCERN score for doctors as well as news agencies were significantly higher than individuals (p<.0001 and p=.03, respectively), prevention higher than treatment and news and reports (p=.03 and p<.0001, respectively), so as to videos of disease knowledge (p=.03 and p<.0001, respectively). No significant differences were found between groups based on different type of doctors. Negative correlation was observed between video durations and likes (r=-.194, p=.012) Only shares had positive correlation with GQS and DISCERN scores(r=0.22, p<.01 and r=0.203, p<.01, respectively).
Conclusions:
Short videos can be considered a poor quality source of health information related to liver cancer, most of which are posted by doctors. People's preference for videos is negatively correlated with the duration of the video, with people preferring videos that are practical and entertaining. People need to be careful when choosing videos to obtain medical content.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.