Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Mar 11, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 11, 2023 - May 25, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 21, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Performance of ChatGPT in Medical Biochemistry Using Clinical Case Vignettes: Observational Study

Surapaneni KM

Assessing the Performance of ChatGPT in Medical Biochemistry Using Clinical Case Vignettes: Observational Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e47191

DOI: 10.2196/47191

PMID: 37934568

PMCID: 10664016

Assessing the Performance of ChatGPT in Medical Biochemistry Using Clinical Case Vignettes

  • Krishna Mohan Surapaneni

ABSTRACT

Background:

ChatGPT has gained global attention recently owing to its high performance in generating wide range of information and retrieving any kind of data instantaneously. ChatGPT has also been tested for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and has successfully cleared the medical exam. Thus, its usability in medical education is now one of the key discussions worldwide.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT in Medical biochemistry using clinical case vignettes.

Methods:

We evaluated the performance of ChatGPT in Medical biochemistry using 10 clinical case vignettes. Clinical case vignettes were randomly selected and typed onto ChatGPT along with the options. We tested the responses for each clinical case twice. The answers generated by ChatGPT were saved and checked using our reference material.

Results:

ChatGPT generated correct answers for 4 questions in the first attempt. For the other cases, there was difference in responses generated by ChatGPT in the first and second attempt. But to our surprise, for Case 3, different answers were given with multiple attempts. We believe this to have happened owing to the complexity of the case.

Conclusions:

According to the findings of our study, ChatGPT may not be considered an accurate information provider that can be applied in medical education to improve learning and assessment. Although, AI has the capability to transform medical education, we emphasize on the validation of such data produced by such AI systems for correctness and dependability before it could be put into practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Surapaneni KM

Assessing the Performance of ChatGPT in Medical Biochemistry Using Clinical Case Vignettes: Observational Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e47191

DOI: 10.2196/47191

PMID: 37934568

PMCID: 10664016

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.