Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 11, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Federal Communications Commission and Microsoft Estimates of Broadband Access for Mental Health Video Telemedicine Among Veterans: Retrospective Cohort Study

O'Shea AM, Mulligan K, Carter KD, Haraldsson B, Wray CM, Shahnazi A, Kaboli PJ

Comparing Federal Communications Commission and Microsoft Estimates of Broadband Access for Mental Health Video Telemedicine Among Veterans: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47100

DOI: 10.2196/47100

PMID: 39116440

PMCID: 11342002

Federal Communications Commission versus Microsoft Broadband Datasets: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Broadband Access for Video Telemedicine

  • Amy M.J. O'Shea; 
  • Kailey Mulligan; 
  • Knute D Carter; 
  • Bjarni Haraldsson; 
  • Charlie M Wray; 
  • Ariana Shahnazi; 
  • Peter J Kaboli

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of telemedicine in healthcare. However, video telemedicine requires adequate broadband internet speeds. As video-based telemedicine grows, variations in broadband availability must be accurately measured and characterized.

Objective:

To compare Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Microsoft© United States Broadband Usage data sources using county level broadband penetration rates among Veterans receiving mental health care from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods:

Retrospective observational cohort study using administrative data to identify mental health visits from January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2020, among 1,161 VHA mental health clinics. The exposure is county-level penetration rates calculated as the percentage of the county population with access to adequate broadband speeds (i.e., download ≥25 megabits per second – Mbps) as measured by the FCC and Microsoft©. All veterans receiving VHA mental health services during the study period were included and categorized based on their ever use of video mental health visits. Penetration rates were compared between and within data sources, stratified by video vs. no video telemedicine use.

Results:

Over the 2-year study period, 1,474,024 veterans with a VHA mental health visit were identified. Average broadband penetration rates varied by source (FCC: mean=91.3%; SD=12.5% vs Microsoft©: mean=48.2%, SD=18.1%; p<0.001). Within each data source, penetration rates generally increased from 2019 to 2020. Adjusted regression analyses estimated the change after pandemic onset versus pre-pandemic in quarterly county-based mental health visit count; patients with video visits versus those without increased video visit use (Microsoft© incident rate ratio (IRR)=1.04, 95% CI=1.01-1.10; p<0.001; FCC IRR=1.14, 95% CI=1.11-1.18; p<0.001).

Conclusions:

This study found FCC broadband data estimates higher and less variable county-level penetration rates. Regardless of data source, veterans without mental health video visits lived in counties with lower penetration rates highlighting the need for accurate broadband speeds to prioritize infrastructure and intervention development based on the greatest community-level impacts. Future work should link broadband penetration rates to differences in clinical outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

O'Shea AM, Mulligan K, Carter KD, Haraldsson B, Wray CM, Shahnazi A, Kaboli PJ

Comparing Federal Communications Commission and Microsoft Estimates of Broadband Access for Mental Health Video Telemedicine Among Veterans: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47100

DOI: 10.2196/47100

PMID: 39116440

PMCID: 11342002

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.